Which candidate do you agree with on...

Iran

Issue Position |

President Obama said during his 2012 State of the Union address that he would “take no options off the table” to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, suggesting he is open to using military force to achieve that goal.

However, he has urged Israel not to unilaterally attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, insisting there is still time to pressure the Islamic republic to abandon its nuclear ambitions through other means.

In 2010, the president signed legislation tightening sanctions on companies doing business in Iran, although he pushed for a controversial exemption for China. His administration gained support from China and Russia to pass United Nations sanctions against Iran’s military establishment in 2010. Obama signed further unilateral sanctions in December that allow the U.S. to sanction foreign banks that carry out oil-related transactions with Iran's central bank.

Endorse

Obama on Iran
234 Comments

Reader Endorsements

Víctor Centeno

Víctor Centeno I am an immigrant... a veteran of the U.S. Army and have been here for 20 years! ► "América" (the U.S.) is not perfect... but it is a good country, and now more than the past: A GREAT COUNTRY! ("when ...See More

Beckie Fain

Beckie Fain because he need four more to help the USA

Virginia Whidbee

Virginia Whidbee Obama seems to have a better foreign policy plan. He is also more experienced in this subject as well.

Gabriel Brown

Gabriel Brown I don't want a nuclear Iran, but sorry, it's gonna happen. And saber-rattling doesn't get us anywhere.

Kate Anderson

Kate Anderson The President is the right person for this topic

Michael Wells

Michael Wells Obama has been the steady hand dealing with Iran. If you like shoot from the hip diplomacy of the Bush years the Romney is your guy. I don't fee comfortable with going back to that.

Jamie Deveaux

Jamie Deveaux I trust President Obama on this issue based on Romney's statements on Benghazi.

Gary Allen Pool

Gary Allen Pool I believe that President Obama favors a more diplomatic approach that includes economic sanctions in order to achieve results in curbing Iran's atomic ambitions. Mr. Romney appears to favor military action. I do not agree with placing more young American ...See More

Michael Minjack

Michael Minjack Do we want another unfunded INVASION and 7000 cream of the crop soldiers dying for what??

Betsy Wedemeyer

Betsy Wedemeyer Obama has handled world affairs with finesse. I trust him to continue to do so.

Twyla Dorzweiler

Twyla Dorzweiler Because we need a level headed person representing us abroad and dealing with issues where diplomacy is a must. Mitt Romney insults our allies, I perish the thought of him dealing with any country perceived as a potential threat.

C Fred Crawmer

C Fred Crawmer it's n ugly world out there n I believe our CIC will make the correct choice when push comes to shove.

Elenushka Toledo

Elenushka Toledo Because I trust Obama!

Carl Barbee

Carl Barbee DIPLOMACY AND SANCTIONS

Bob Maynard

Bob Maynard Romney would start a war with Iran, supported by Dick Cheney and Carl Rowe.

Jill Gering

Jill Gering Having listened to both candidates on the subject, it is clear that all Romney did in the debate was to mimic Obama's policies which on the campaign trail Romney has claimed as his own. During the debate between the two, ...See More

Carmin Liz

Carmin Liz Diplomacy

Roger Bauer

Roger Bauer Obama favors diplomacy rather than belligerence.

Savitri Basaviah

Savitri Basaviah Unlike the war hawks, the president is using diplomacy to deal with the issue.

Carrie Mendoza

Carrie Mendoza Obama knows more about foreign policy. He is not reckless in decisions like Romney.

Felipe De Leon Brown

Felipe De Leon Brown President Obama is pursuing the most intelligent course that I've seen in decades. Those who would embroil us in another unnecessary and costly conflict should offer themselves up as the first casualties.

Felipe De Leon Brown

Felipe De Leon Brown President Obama is pursuing the most intelligent course that I've seen in decades. Those who would embroil us in another unnecessary and costly conflict should offer themselves up as the first casualties.

Jewels Ofthenile

Jewels Ofthenile Obama takes no option off the table and will carefully put the pressure on as Iran continues to resist. Romney will pull the trigger before aiming. It is not a chance to take, GWB did that with Iraq which was ...See More

Eugene Barufkin

Eugene Barufkin Barack is using logic and not idiotic hollow ideas.

Linda Carol Wickham-Young

Linda Carol Wickham-Young I understand the sanctions are working against Iran, what has not been talked about is BP owns oil fields in Iran, England is our ally as well as Israel, I think this is where the difficulty is because Europe does ...See More

ANdy Chou

ANdy Chou He believes in the future of America.

Robert Miller

Robert Miller Romney would have us in a war with Iran in a month. Bush Neocons surround him.

Zoraida Rivera

Zoraida Rivera This president will do anything in his power to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Michael Simo

Michael Simo Barack Obama priority is to protect the interest of The United States as it should.

BeenThere DoneThat

BeenThere DoneThat We don't need another war and we don't need another fake cowboy in the white house

Sydney Elaine

Sydney Elaine For now, I believe sanctions are enough. They still don't have nuclear capabilities. We don't need another war. If anyone wants to take out the nukes they're trying to make, it should be Israel. That's who they want to wipe ...See More

Deborah Edwina Allen

Deborah Edwina Allen MITT ROMNEY WANTS WAR WITH IRAN, BUT HE HAS NEVER SERVED THIS COUNTRY NOR HAS ANY OF HIS SONS. MITT WILL LET OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN GET INJURED OR DIE BUT NOT HIS OWN!!! MITT AND HIS SONS ARE COWARDS!!!

Lea Lyra Gary

Lea Lyra Gary He is responsible and reasonable and cautious.

Wayne Mackert

Wayne Mackert Does Mitt Romnesia even know where Iran is? Let's sit and talk with the Ayatollah he said. Duh!

Doug Stevenson

Doug Stevenson He is steady and strong. He sticks by his word.

Neal Walker

Neal Walker He has thought about the issues; Romney hasn't.

Floyd A John

Floyd A John neo cons continue to espouse the "bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran" plan

Catherine Cadieux

Catherine Cadieux He is much better informed and competent in foreign policy matters.

Dave McCormack

Dave McCormack I think both of them will take military action if we need to However i think Romney will be too trigger happy, and escalate another Bush/Iraq situation that we can't afford!

Susan Bounds

Susan Bounds I concur with the President's approach of exhausting all means before resorting to a military solution. Based on his track record, I have no doubt he would be willing and able to take military action if all other avenues failed, ...See More

Jan Jordan

Jan Jordan Because he has been consistent in what he says he will do and he isn't funded and supported by groups that favor the lead with guns not diplomancy approach.

Kitty Jawitz

Kitty Jawitz He is well respected through most of world - as he is intelligent and willing to work through diplomacy. Romney, idiot- two faced thing, just WANTS to be Pres. Worst thing for the US.

Edward Murray

Edward Murray Because the Presidents actions/sanctions are working and at least he tells the truth.

E. Ann Powell

E. Ann Powell Sanctions on Iran are working. No need for war with them to provide kick-backs to defense contractors, which is at the core of Romney's increase in defense spending.

Martina Moore

Martina Moore First of all, Mr.President has done many good jobs during his term. Secondly of all, I must say Obama has more knowledge of this issues with Iran than Mitt is.

Florence Symister

Florence Symister He is on the right course and the sanctions are working

Sal DiMaria

Sal DiMaria I wonder if Mitt --the businessman--knows where Iran is.

Elizabeth Hartmann Clancy

Elizabeth Hartmann Clancy President Obama keeps a cool head, uses tact, intelligence and dipomacy to make the best decisions for our country.

Donna Hicks Melton

Donna Hicks Melton His approach is rational.

Catherine Ratliff

Catherine Ratliff He'll be careful and smart, and choose methods and targets strategically.

Rita Lila Manzano Rodriguez

Rita Lila Manzano Rodriguez When Bush asked for the Senate to approve going to war with Irak, Barak Obama voted against it. Now Romney wants to get us to war against Iran. We took Osama Bin Laden down. WE are endinthe reign of terror ...See More

Rozane McCurdy

Rozane McCurdy President Obama understands the importance of tact and diplomacy over chest-beating and inflaming volatile situations. He studies facts and surrounds himself with staff well-informed of the issues at hand rather than relying on pundits paid by millionaires who supply him ...See More

Robert D. Reynolds

Robert D. Reynolds I think Obama is doing the right think at this time. We really don't need a war with Iran.

Anthony Barcelo

Anthony Barcelo diplomacy not cowboy unilateralism and bluster

Deb Moschkin

Deb Moschkin Can I endorse Obama 10,000 times on this issue? Romney wants to go to war with Iran -- his foreign policy advisers are holdovers from the Bush administration, all neocons. If I have anything to say about it, we will ...See More

Eddie Kadoyi

Eddie Kadoyi Look The World has change diplomacy is the way to go. Not the Cowboy style of my way or the highway

James Worthen

James Worthen I trust his determination and resolve.

Cheryl Baxter-Waller

Cheryl Baxter-Waller HE HAS HAD 4 YRS OF EXPIERENCE,TO ROMMEYS NONE

Jake Lester

Jake Lester I trust Obama's foreign policy. I think the sanctions are working, and I trust him to have the proper judgment needed to take a decision when and if a war becomes necessary.

Verma Cooke-hutchinson

Verma Cooke-hutchinson The President is strong against Iran and he needs to keep doing what he is doing.

Jake Lester

Jake Lester Obama takes war, especially the human cost of war very seriously, and has demonstrated his wisdom in managing war (I saw his actions in Iraq when I was there). He also knows and cares about what happens to the human ...See More

Jo-Ann Morgan

Jo-Ann Morgan This is not the time for Mr. Romney's saber rattling. The world is too dangerous for war profiteering.

Sheila Beaudoin

Sheila Beaudoin ITS OBVIOUS.

Chuck Wada

Chuck Wada because Obama has gotten us out of Iraq, is getting us out of Afghanistan, got bin laden and restored friendships with our Allies. Romney is still not even welcome in Italy, a persona non grada in Italy for his business ...See More

Robert Johnson

Robert Johnson Romney has no real answers except another war

Charles Thomas

Charles Thomas why has Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan made false claims about the presidents stand on this? Mr Ryan was asked what he would do different? i did not hear anything to show me why we should get rid of something ...See More

Patricia D Nesberg

Patricia D Nesberg This is a no brainer. He's shown that he takes care of business militarily, yet is reserved and not overreaching.

Thom Isanski

Thom Isanski Trust Obama's level headedness, and diplomatic abilities. Romney, has too many of Bush left overs dealing with this issue, on his team.

Jake Mihalak

Jake Mihalak Google and read about Stuxnet & Flame. This is the way to take down Iran's Nuclear program & Obama is doing it. I give him big Kudos for quietly thinking outside the box with the Israeli's on this. Let the ...See More

Carol Johnson

Carol Johnson We need to keep the sanctions on Iran along with the rest of the western world before we act like idiots start another war. I am tired of wars and believe this can be taken care of in a manner ...See More

Carol Johnson

Carol Johnson We need to keep the sanctions on Iran along with the rest of the western world before we act like idiots start another war. I am tired of wars and believe this can be taken care of in a manner ...See More

Ilse Genovese

Ilse Genovese Support putting pressure on Iran through sanctions.

Andy Bilmanis

Andy Bilmanis we need a cool head not a hot head on this issue

Steve Schonberg

Steve Schonberg We shouldn't create an unnecessary reason for conflagration in the middle east. A strong leader will not go to war to increase the profits of the private defense industry.

SA ReUnion

SA ReUnion Diplomacy should run its course with the US leading the way.

Robert Stone

Robert Stone A very difficult problem, decades of vilifying Iran because of the hostage situation has given us very little leverage. Romney appears to be a shoot, ready, aim sort of guy.

Mary E Pea

Mary E Pea No more wars!

Michael J. Gould

Michael J. Gould Obama stands on principles and Romney lies again and again!

Rob Wood

Rob Wood he is not a flip flopper

Jj Jon Hanson

Jj Jon Hanson Romney is a back stabber . Claims being tough on China and yet as sent jobs there .Oh claiming Russia is a emeny

Sarah Hamer

Sarah Hamer Please God we do not need another war and I believe romney will start a war with Iran

Mara E Meyer

Mara E Meyer Already doing great work with sanctions and limitations to Iran

Diadou Seck

Diadou Seck romney will take us to war .

Yogi Yotch

Yogi Yotch He understands the need for patience. We don't want Iran to be another Afghanistan.

Diana Kitch

Diana Kitch Mitt Romney is a bull in a china shop when dealing with foreign powers. He offends our ALLIES, for God's sake!

Don Mau

Don Mau Open but not committed. Big difference!!

Moru Souare

Moru Souare US IS NO READY TO START A NEW WAR AND ISRAEL SHOULD DICTATE US OFFICIAL WHAT TO DO OR NOT DO, THE NEGOTIATION IS THE BEST WAY TO SUCCEED.

Melissa Marie Lundberg

Melissa Marie Lundberg I like that he is open to all options!

Joe Mbu

Joe Mbu More diplomatic but firm to resolve a burning issue.

Patricia Carlton

Patricia Carlton he's more level-headed

Jonathan Ovalle

Jonathan Ovalle We must stand strong with our Global face, mostly at a time that our country is still recovering.

Carlos Omar Rodríguez

Carlos Omar Rodríguez We cannot just go attacking anyone that doesnt agree with Israel. We can support Israel via economic sanctions, but if Israel wants to go to war with Iran then thats their choice.

Angela Williams

Angela Williams Because he has a steadier hand. He thinks before he speaks and he is thoughtful of what the American people thinks as well.I trust the president and I think he is honest. He won't lie to us.

Leimomi Martin

Leimomi Martin This is an on going issue that will take time and and it will be resolved. I support Obama on this issues.

Kelly Anne Mcpherson

Kelly Anne Mcpherson Diplomacy should be addressed first. If time comes for action, then it will happen. But I do not want my friends and husband being sent to yet another country until it is necessary.

MaryAnne Dease

MaryAnne Dease You really to ask?

Ezekiel Josephs

Ezekiel Josephs Not sure why anyone cares what Iran is doing,..

Betty Mitchell

Betty Mitchell I agree with President Obama because he has the ability to keep the United States on the top of his list on its safety policies. Iran development of nuclear weapons has always been one of President Obama's top priorities.

Tony Fannin

Tony Fannin i think that obama needs the change to finish what he started the real problem is the repulicans , from the beginnig the gop has veto or stopped anything this president has tried to do bush was the total problem ...See More

Laura Nina Thomas

Laura Nina Thomas We tried the military option in Iraq as result a significant number of our young men and women were killed.

Landra Major

Landra Major Obama is not about to start a war with Iran on behalf of Isreal.

Carlos Gonzales

Carlos Gonzales We did the pro-active WAR thing with Iraq. It was poorly planned, poorly executed, and based on Bad Intelligence that lead to a Quagmire. NOW the RNC is engaging in War Talk against IRAN? Sending our Boys and Girls off ...See More

Eric Williams

Eric Williams Once you go to war there is no turning back. I agree with Obama on diplomacy first, sactions and diplomacy second, threats third, silent war fourth, war fifth. Repubs want war with everone who disapgrees with the west policies. diplomacy ...See More

Shaner Joy

Shaner Joy We do not need another war. I do not want to see any more military men and women sent overseas.

Jake Black

Jake Black President Obama seems to understand negotiation. Romney talks as if it wants war. We don't need another war.

Maeve Ryan

Maeve Ryan This is a big one. Romney was saying that we need to attack Iran. That could set off a huge war and I don't want my family and friends to die for that war. Now i heard Romney doesn't think ...See More

Jerry Planta

Jerry Planta EXPERIENCE IS THE KEY, AND WE DO NOT WANT ANOTHER WAR. WE NEED MORE JOBS AND THAT IS WHAT THE PRESIDENT WANTS TOO

Cheryl Zolotor

Cheryl Zolotor President Obama has more experience dealing with foreign policy than Governor Romney.

Lee B. Jolliffe

Lee B. Jolliffe A sitting President can't tell you everything he knows. And I think the "superspy" bombing of Iran's power-system leading into its nuclear facilities was probably done at the United States' behest.

David Hess

David Hess Peace with a strong hand and NO MORE WARS.

Gary Majam

Gary Majam I can't imagine Romney being the commander-in-chief. It will be a total disaster.

Sean M Cotton

Sean M Cotton As in all tense situations you should always treat the adversary with respect to gain their respect. You take them at their word and if they do not abide by it, then swiftly and decisively take action. Then, you will ...See More

Joe Ann Daugherty

Joe Ann Daugherty He is the only qualified person for the job.

Alvin George

Alvin George I believe he is still the one to take the country in the right direction. I beleive the Gov. Rommy is still hiding something by not showing his incomne tax. He only care for the people who had a lot ...See More

Iris Sanchez

Iris Sanchez Base on Romney latest comments about supporting going to war again, I think President Obama would handle International Relations on a better way. Don't know about you all but I'm tired of seeing American soldiers dying overseas.

Gwendolyn Carter

Gwendolyn Carter I trust President Obama to make the right decision about war and peace.

Marsha Hobratschk

Marsha Hobratschk Issue Position | President Obama said during his 2012 State of the Union address that he would “take no options off the table” to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, suggesting he is open to using military force to ...See More

Allison Houston

Allison Houston The better leader, hands down.

Kris Ållen

Kris Ållen I think that a War over Iran would be a mistake, we have drones to do our killing from afar.George Bush took out Saddam by mistake and allowed some imbalance in the Middle East, If Israel want war for that ...See More

Anshul Gupta

Anshul Gupta To counter those who are complaining that Romney has yet to offer a single policy difference from Bush, he changed the last letter of the name of the country he'd like to invade.

Kathleen Nelson

Kathleen Nelson Obama's approach is cautionary while Romney is beating the war drums. Americans do NOT want another unwarranted war. Right now the Republicans are beating the war drums unnecessarily--just because Bibi wants to go to war now. Let those who want ...See More

Bill Macomber

Bill Macomber Romney is a draft dodging quick reacting fool. He has no idea what a war with Iran would do to our economy because he has no idea about economics. America isn't a corporation my friend. A war with Iran would ...See More

JO GA

JO GA He is calm and steady but very decisive !!! He calmly got osama bin laden while he was at the correspondent's dinner !!!

John Bryant

John Bryant He has a cool hand on foreign policy.

Manny Oliver

Manny Oliver His foreign policy I think will Iran will never stop treating the world, The prime minster of Isareal has no business try to get the US to attack Iran, if he has the balls let him at it the US ...See More

Tim Perkins

Tim Perkins Mitt Romney has clearly shown during his recent trip to Europe and the middle east (during the Olympics) that he is clueless when it comes to dealing with other countries.

Ravshan Tohirov

Ravshan Tohirov Hi never do something under dictation some country or some group of peoples, I admire him

Tim Johnson

Tim Johnson He has a command of the situation and understands the importance of the need to strive for peace and stability in the world.

Dmitriy Bivol

Dmitriy Bivol he is waaay more openminded and informed on issues

Ron Vanderford

Ron Vanderford I greatly prefer Obama's leadership in foreign affairs.

Brian Wind

Brian Wind Obama is calmer and much more rational than Romney. Obama is better informed and a much more rational person. I endorse Obama.

Will Cannon

Will Cannon Romney is a war-monger. We can't afford another war.

Tony Capozziello

Tony Capozziello Obama has done a great job in the midst of wars handed down to him and a rapidly changing middle east. Candidate Romney can say what he wants, but history shows all candidates change their foreign policy tune once in ...See More

Alan J. Franklin

Alan J. Franklin Candidate Romney is a war monger. Just like George W. Bush he will take us into another unpaid for war.

Faye Godfrey

Faye Godfrey Obama can do a better job dealing with Iran issues.

Carolyn Ottes

Carolyn Ottes Obama is the best man for the job.

Bob Walters

Bob Walters President Obama will not authorize stupid military adventures in the Mideast

David Britt

David Britt Because he's a grown up who can make a decision without a script written by a neocon.

Olav Bryant Smith

Olav Bryant Smith I trust Obama to do everything he can to keep us out of another war. I suspect, on the other hand, that Romney, like other Republicans, is just looking for another excuse to keep feeding the military-industrial complex.

Hany E. Ozman

Hany E. Ozman Keep it clear, keep it simple. Dont listen to the Israelis, they dont care about none.

Carol Richert

Carol Richert Romney is totally out of touch on foreign affairs.

Roni Knell

Roni Knell There is no good way to solve this problem. As long as you have radicals who don't care what will happen should such weaponry be used it will be developed, secretly. One would have to totally isolate Iran or any ...See More

Tony Cristoforo

Tony Cristoforo Because I believe he is doing a great job on foreign policy, he still has work to do on our econmony,!

SisterJanet Strong

SisterJanet Strong He is honest

James Graziano

James Graziano Obama is wearing Iran down, and garnering support from all nations - he just got Russia and China to join in. The use of economic sanctions is starting to work. Romney is saber rattling and leading us toward yet another ...See More

AmandaKay Schraufnagel Mazurkiewicz

AmandaKay Schraufnagel Mazurkiewicz We do NOT need another war. We are NOT the world police. If Iran has the capability to make a nuclear weapon they are past the stopping stage. It is like dealing with a ledge jumper you need to talk ...See More

Jerry Ez

Jerry Ez Sanctions are working...but why would we want GOP at it, didn't Bush & GOP talk a big talk under their rule and what have we gotten? More Iran!

LuVorise Dahlman

LuVorise Dahlman I endorse Barack on Iran...we can't as country continue to fight everyone's battles...we have our own...i.e poverty, attack on women's rights and high unemployment.

Listiel Rock

Listiel Rock here is one reason why The President needs to be given a second term. Keep Mitantic away from the oval office. We need a cool head, a thinker, an analyst and a man of resolve to deal with Iran. As ...See More

Steven Foster

Steven Foster He is not just trying to get us in another war without good reason. I believe he will make the right decision if it comes down to that.

Denise Oliver-Velez

Denise Oliver-Velez Barack Obama is not going to lead us into war with Iran.

Martin Chiaravalloti

Martin Chiaravalloti The US helped create Iran by supporting the despots who came before the Islamists. Going into another war is not the answer.

Jennifer Levitan

Jennifer Levitan You don't to war without 1. a way to pay for it. 2. an exit plan. 3. a damn good reason (because you can is not a reason.)

Thomas Mosby

Thomas Mosby Bc we don't need to get into another war, like Romney wants..

JeaGloris Powell

JeaGloris Powell Because President Barack Obama will continue to keep America safe. He Took down Osama Bin Laden..

Daniel MacCabe

Daniel MacCabe Obama is not beholden to the Neo-Conservatives. I hope this can help him keep the situation under control. I have more faith in Obama than anybody in the party of George W Bush.

Ingo Dean

Ingo Dean Diplomacy requires the willingness to sit down to talk even with those you don't like. Romney is no diplomat.

Allison Grunwald

Allison Grunwald Obama isn't a moron, that's why.

Juan Israel

Juan Israel Anything to do with Foreign policy...I mean really? Did everyone see the job Romney did with the Russians and Brits? Yeah...and those are our allies.

Barbara Jones Hatcher

Barbara Jones Hatcher This is a regime that cannot be trusted!

Donna M Crane

Donna M Crane A watchful waiting along with other nations of Iran is what is needed. We do not need to go to War against Iran. I want the Draft restore whenever a new war is voted on, and the children of those ...See More

Tashira Murray

Tashira Murray Tey diffently dont need a nuclear weapon. I ould be open to using military force if the issue couldn't be handled by peaceful talk

Jane Davis

Jane Davis Obama speaks out loud and clear. Romney will change his mind tomorrow. Watch out!

Linda Carol Wickham-Young

Linda Carol Wickham-Young He will take no option off the table to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and he suggests he is open to using military force to achieve the goal. He has a proven record as Commander in Chief. He ...See More

Yannick Luce Yambaka

Yannick Luce Yambaka Obama has shown us his capabilities!!

Karla Walker

Karla Walker I support my President!

Robin Nicole

Robin Nicole As an American citizen who grew up near the Oak Ridge complex and in support of those who died serving our country during the past 12 years it is our duty to stop Iran from creating a nuclear bomb. If ...See More

Jason Safford

Jason Safford Since Romney can never make a decision and stick with it for more than a few minutes, the last thing I would want is him holding the reins on this one.

Michaelle Michelle Marks

Michaelle Michelle Marks What Romney is suggesting....."been there done that"

Muthu Ganapathy

Muthu Ganapathy We cannot afford to have another war at this time. We need to avoid the conflict by strategically.

Shari Turner

Shari Turner Obama is keeping his cool when it comes to Iran. He will do what he has to if he needs to but isn't going to just rush in there guns ablazing right now. Romney sure does seem like he can't ...See More

Anna Neaphyte

Anna Neaphyte I am more comfortable with a moderate, reasonable, persistant diplomatic approach when it comes to Iran vs. the escalating 'rah rah' rhetoric which reinforces fears and pushes us toward international pre-emptive conflict that accomplishes nothing except profits for fat-cat military ...See More

Jay Staxx Sr.

Jay Staxx Sr. I agree with POTUS on Iran! However, we need to take a closer look at the cargo planes transporting supplies to Syria, via Iraqi Airspace!

Ruhy Bremen

Ruhy Bremen He is peace maker, not a war that cause distear.

Robert Merle Dane

Robert Merle Dane I hope that neither would find it necessary to invade Iran. Militarily, we have them surrounded. Both agree that Iran will not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. I just trust Obama to use every available option before putting my ...See More

Jeff Bunting

Jeff Bunting I hope we think very carefully before we use military force against Iran and believe that Obama's not as much of a hawk as some liked to try to believe. Romney on the other hand wouldn't hesitate.

Damian Saunders

Damian Saunders Obama is a skilled tactician with an eye for timing and appropriateness of response to international threat. I trust him and his team of advisers over Romney on foreign affairs.

Sage Keramet Bellamy

Sage Keramet Bellamy He is the one who can negotiate a peaceful resolution, after all... he did nail BinLaden

Jan Strain

Jan Strain Out of the 2 choices, Obama comes closest - Who the HELL are WE to make decisions on any country? Romney and McCain before him think Might = Right...Well guess what, it doesn't and we are not the mighty any ...See More

Mike Askme

Mike Askme No more wars, especially a war for Israel.

Kojo Asafo-Agyei

Kojo Asafo-Agyei He understands the issue better than Romney. Diplomacy and sanctions are better than saber rattling or war.

Jackie Wilson

Jackie Wilson They have the same idea, sanctions, but we do not want war. We are friends with the people of Iran, at least we the people are. Governments make war, not the people.

Donna Costrino

Donna Costrino He is intelligent and thoughtful. I trust his judgement. He will do the right thing for our country.

Asuquo Edem

Asuquo Edem Managing volatiility of the situation

Breckin Perry

Breckin Perry The President will attack Iran if they go nuclear. Iran would then be able to wipe out our allies.

Grampa Grifo

Grampa Grifo i like turtles

Dawana Lee

Dawana Lee Iran is scarey but I trust Obama more than Romney with his whole team of Bush advisors on anything that has to with the middle east. Im tired of war

Frank Sullivan

Frank Sullivan No more war

Bill Pittman

Bill Pittman Bottom line...Obama makes more sense!

Don Moore

Don Moore Medicare

Paul Trotter

Paul Trotter Look- Romney is ready to go to war with Iran. President Obsma with Clinton are adept at keeping peace and keeping our young men away from battle and wasted millions.

Yonas Tesema

Yonas Tesema Foreign Affairs Experience, Far thinking, Smart Leader who does not want America to be involved in another Middle East war for nothing.

Jane M Comer

Jane M Comer Obama realizes that international matters need international solutions. We do not need another haphazard war

Bill Shelton

Bill Shelton He has proven himself level-headed in a crisis. We need this leadership.

Marlene Langkilde Tuitele

Marlene Langkilde Tuitele Haven't we had enough of our military dying on senseless wars - if they want to start anymore wars, which Romney & Ryan would do with Iran - send their kids over on the front lines to die along side ...See More

Marlene Langkilde Tuitele

Marlene Langkilde Tuitele Haven't we had enough of our military dying on senseless wars - if they want to start anymore wars, which Romney & Ryan would do with Iran - send their kids over on the front lines to die along side ...See More

Justin Gibbs

Justin Gibbs Barely, neither plan is going to work very well. World War III is the alternative to Obama's plan.

Patty Scott Miller

Patty Scott Miller Because we have no business getting into that hornet's nest.

Anthony M Battista

Anthony M Battista He is totally commited to US security and has earned the right to continue what is to date an excellent foreign policy

Melody Goad

Melody Goad President Obama has been right to work threw diplomatic progress instead of rushing into war in Iran.

Jason Varner

Jason Varner Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Let Iran do as they will. It is none of our business.

Dan Hess

Dan Hess First things first: re-establish diplomatic relations with Tehran rather than going through Switzerland to even have a discussion. Bush's mistake in rejecting Iran shouldn't be continued past 2012. No options off the table means let's try the humane ones first.See More

Paul Goldstein

Paul Goldstein Dan Senor is a senior foreign policy advisor to Romney and a certified war monger. Under Bush, when things were coming undone in Iraq, Senor repeatedly lied to the public suggesting in interviews things were fine when they were falling ...See More

Subramanian Venkatraman

Subramanian Venkatraman We all by now know that it is easy to start a war but all wars will end in destruction of all with real victory to none. Our President espouses real democracy which means disputes and difference in opinions should ...See More

Birkan Saray

Birkan Saray Republican's have alway's screwed up US's foreign policy one way or another. By what Obama has done by working closely with Turkey (#2 NATO ally) is great, and must continue.

Raul Cardenas

Raul Cardenas PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS MORE EXPERIENCE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND COMANDS GREATER SUPPORT FROM THE WORLD COMMUNITY. Raleigh, North Carolina. Raul Cardenas

Mary Ann Keenan

Mary Ann Keenan President Obama is working to keep Iran nuclear-free without going to war. I support his approach. War is not the only way to settle disputes.

Jason M. Williams

Jason M. Williams He has proven himself already on the International stage. Romney has 0 international experience.

Chynna Rolland

Chynna Rolland Romney scares me when I think of him leading our country in a confrontation with Iran. He believes in sending our troops into harms way while his grown sons have never served a day in our armed services. This in ...See More

David Fernandez

David Fernandez he has a full gasp of the geopolitical issues and dimensions. romney is lacking

Pam Miner

Pam Miner Obama is not going to rush into war.

Srinadh Godavarthy

Srinadh Godavarthy I don't want another war.

Frank Robert

Frank Robert Without going into detail....I just do

Spot Ify

Spot Ify There's no need to sabre-rattle our way into another sticky war we can't afford.

Emberdink Humberdittle

Emberdink Humberdittle He is excellent on foreign policy matters, and Romney is running on essentially the same platform GW Bush ran on. We don't need another shortsighted unethical crank in the White House when we are still mitigating the previous disaster.

Valerie Bock

Valerie Bock No more war.

Eliseo Perez

Eliseo Perez Prosperity is not defined by how big our guns are but our willing fullness to negotiate.

L Denise Hall

L Denise Hall Romney is a FOOL!!!!!

David Lux

David Lux Back to 2008 Obama has led on this. It's time to stop the tough-guy bluster and warmongering. We need to use diplomacy and allies. Romney sounds downright dangerous here!

Pam Miner

Pam Miner It may not have to come down to a war. this needs to be open to all options.

Mary Gannon Stolle

Mary Gannon Stolle Slow and steady.

Samora Proctor

Samora Proctor Proven track record !

Jasmine Jackson

Jasmine Jackson Obama is dealing with a volatile enviornment, so of course negotiations are going to be slow! It's ridiculous to think he could solve the nuclear threat problem in a week. He has to not only think about the threat, but ...See More

Johnice Reid

Johnice Reid I agree with the approach the President has taken with Iran thus far!

Doug Tise

Doug Tise The DOJ is going after banks working with Iran Hard. First Administration to do so with such fervor.

Bill Miller

Bill Miller The Republicans are still in Bush mode -- in fact they've been behaving like Bush on steroids. Can I trust them with their hands on the tiller in these reef obstructed waters? . . Heck no. . . . . ...See More

Calvin Price

Calvin Price haven't we had enough of the neocons?

Hanns Barker

Hanns Barker I think Iran is a dangerous and evil place of you are a woman or LGBT, too. President Obama knows this but he will use diplomacy, the carrot, but he will not be pushed either,the stick. While I may agree ...See More

Solja Itstrue

Solja Itstrue The President is trying to get us back to the business of rebuilding America, not going into another war. Iran has been a problem for many, many years and it's not going to change any time soon. He is the ...See More

Paul Klutes

Paul Klutes Pragmatism rules.

Bailey Dm

Bailey Dm he has ket us safe this country is war weary i hope we do not go to war but i trust the pres to handle this issue

Robert Lieb

Robert Lieb The last thing we need is another unpaid-for war.

Ruth Fish

Ruth Fish I trust the Presidentt to keep the sanctions in place for Iran rather than military intervention even though he said all things were on the table.

Thomas S Campbell

Thomas S Campbell Harnessing nuclear energy can be a thing of beauty but it comes with great responsibility, we must choose wisely who can use this energy in safe, responsible and productive ways and Iran is consistently not one of them. Once they ...See More

Obama's Statements (127)

January 27, 2010
Now, these diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of nuclear weapons.  That's why North Korea now faces increased isolation, and stronger sanctions –- sanctions that are being vigorously enforced.  That's why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated.  And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt:  They, too, will face growing consequences.  That is a promise. 
Request a Fact Check
January 27, 2010
As we have for over 60 years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores.  But we also do it because it is right.  That's why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild.    That's why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan; why we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran; why we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea.  For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity.    Always. 
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2010
Furthermore, since I took office, I’ve been committed to a “reset” of our relationship with Russia.  When the United States and Russia can cooperate effectively, it advances the mutual interests of our two nations, and the security and prosperity of the wider world.  We’ve so far already worked together on Afghanistan.  We’ve coordinated our economic efforts through the G20.  We are working together to pressure Iran to meet its international obligations.  And today, we have reached agreement on one of my administration’s top national security priorities -- a pivotal new arms control agreement.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
Under President Sarkozy’s leadership, France has further secured its rightful place as a leader in Europe and around the world, recognizing that meeting global challenges requires global partnerships.  France took the historic step of returning to NATO’s military command, and we are working to revitalize our transatlantic bonds, including a strong, capable European Union, which the United States firmly supports -- because a close transatlantic partnership is critical to progress, whether it’s applying our combined strength to promote development and confront violent extremism in Africa, or reconstruction in Haiti, or advancing peace from the Caucasus to the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
We discussed our shared determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.  On this the United States and France are united, are inseparable.  With our P5-plus-1 partners, we offer Iran good faith proposals to resolve this matter through diplomacy.  But Iran thus far has rejected those offers.  Today, the international community is more united than ever on the need for Iran to uphold its obligations.  And that’s why we’re pursuing strong sanctions through the U.N. Security Council.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
Now, on Iran, I am very satisfied with what President Obama has said.  The time has come to take decisions.  Iran cannot continue its mad race.  Now, we don’t want to punish Iran, which deserves better than what it has by way of leadership today, and therefore fully support in order to get stronger, tougher sanctions at the Security Council and take the necessary decisions is what you have.  I have said to President Obama that with Angela Merkel and Gordon Brown we will make all necessary efforts to ensure that Europe as a whole engages in the sanction regime.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
On the Middle East, it’s excellent news to hear that the United States are thus engaged.  Of course peace in the Middle East is the -- is something which concerns primarily the Israelis and the Palestinians.  However, the absence of peace in the Middle East is a problem for all of us, because what it does is keep feeding terrorism all over the world.  And I wish to express my solidarity vis-à-vis President Obama in condemning the settlement process.  Everybody knows how engaged and committed I am vis-à-vis Israel’s security, but the settlement process achieves nothing and contributes in no way to Israel’s safety and security.  There comes a time when you have to take initiatives in favor of peace.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
Q    Thank you, sir.  Thank you for your patience.  President Obama, you’ve talked about the importance of having consequences for Iran over its nuclear program, but is there ever a real deadline?  What is your specific timeline for U.N. sanctions on Iran?  And is it one that the American people can believe in?
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
On Iran, we came in with a very clear approach and a very clear strategy, and it was an open book to the world.  We said we would engage Iran and give them an opportunity to take the right path, a path that would lead to prosperity and opportunity for their people and a peaceful region, and one in which they would allow themselves to become a full-fledged member of the community of nations.  The alternative path was further isolation and further consequences.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
We mobilized the international community around this approach, including partners like Russia that in the past might have been more hesitant to take a firmer stance on Iran’s nuclear program.  What we said, though, was that there was going to be a time limit to it and that if we had not seen progress by the end of the year, it was time for us to move forward on that sanctions track.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
My hope is that we are going to get this done this spring.  So I’m not interested in waiting months for a sanctions regime to be in place; I’m interested in seeing that regime in place in weeks.  And we are working diligently with our international partners, emphasizing to them that, as Nicolas said, this is not simply an issue of trying to isolate Iran; it has enormous implications for the safety and the security of the entire region.  We don’t want to see a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
The long-term consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran are unacceptable.  And so Nicolas, myself and others agree that we have engaged; the door remains open if the Iranians choose to walk through it.  But they understand very clearly what the terms of a diplomatic solution would be.  And in the interim we are going to move forcefully on a U.N. sanctions regime.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2010
But it’s still difficult, partly because, let’s be honest, Iran is a oil producer and there are a lot of countries around the world that, regardless of Iran’s offenses, are thinking that their commercial interests are more important to them than these long-term geopolitical interests.  And so we have to continue to apply pressure not just on Iran but we have to make sure that we are communicating very clearly that this is very important to the United States.
Request a Fact Check
March 31, 2010
So moving towards clean energy is about our security.  It’s also about our economy.  And it’s about the future of our planet. And what I hope is, is the policies that we’ve laid out -- from hybrid fleets to offshore drilling, from nuclear energy to wind energy -- underscores the seriousness with which my administration takes this challenge.  It’s a challenge that requires us to break out of the old ways of thinking, to think and act anew.  And it requires each of us, regardless of whether we’re in the private sector or the public sector, whether we’re in the military or in the civilian side of government, to think about how could we be doing things better, how could we be doing things smarter -- so that we are no longer tethered to the whims of what happens somewhere in the Middle East or with other major oil-producing nations.
Request a Fact Check
June 24, 2010
Along with our international partners, we passed and are enforcing new U.N sanctions against North Korea.  We offered Iran the prospect of a better future, and when they refused, we joined with Russia and our partners on the Security Council to impose the toughest sanctions ever faced by the government of Iran.
Request a Fact Check
June 26, 2010
We also discussed Iran, and I thanked David for his stalwart support of the United Nations Security Resolution 1929 -- the toughest sanctions that have been imposed on the Iranian government through the United Nations Security Council. We now have to make sure that we follow up in terms of implementation, and that was a major discussion point.
Request a Fact Check
June 27, 2010
And we talked also about the incident in which North Korea attacked the -- attacked and sunk the North Korean naval -- South Korean naval vessel, and we talked also about the issue of Iran and Afghanistan.  Always we have to work together to respond, and we share a common understanding of those issues.
Request a Fact Check
June 29, 2010
We talked about our joint interest and work together in combating violent extremism.  And we talked about a range of strategic issues, including issues related to Afghanistan and Pakistan; Iran and its attempts to develop nuclear weapons capacity.  We discussed the Middle East peace process and the importance of moving forward in a significant and bold way in securing a Palestinian homeland that can live side by side with a secure and prosperous Israeli state.
Request a Fact Check
June 30, 2010
I hear worries like this all the time -- from folks that I talk to in town halls like this, but also in the letters that I read each night from all across the country.  And it’s frustrating and often it’s heartbreaking.  And that’s why even though there’s -- there are plenty of challenges on our plate -- everything from Afghanistan to Iran to the oil spill, all critical issues that go to our long-term prosperity and security -- nothing is more important than reversing the damage of the great recession and getting folks back to work.
Request a Fact Check
July 20, 2010
We discussed the continuing threat posed by Iran’s nuclear program.  On this we are united:  The Iranian government must fulfill its international obligations.  The new sanctions imposed by the U.N. Security Council, the United States, and other countries are putting unprecedented pressure on the Iranian government.  And I thanked David for Great Britain’s efforts to ensure strong European Union sanctions in the coming days.
Request a Fact Check
July 20, 2010
I think we did have a very valuable opportunity today to discuss in real depth a strong and a shared agenda on Afghanistan, on global economic recovery, and on the Middle East. And this relationship isn’t just, as you put it, an extraordinary special relationship.  To me, it is also an absolutely essential relationship if we are going to deliver the security and the prosperity that our people need.  And I thought again today in our discussions just how closely aligned our interests are on all of the issues that we discussed.
Request a Fact Check
July 20, 2010
The Middle East was the third area that we focused on today. We both want a secure, peaceful and stable Middle East.  And that means two things:  First, as Barack has just said, Iran must give up its pursuit of a nuclear weapon.  We urge the Iranian regime to resume negotiations with the international community without delay.  It’s not too late for it to do so.  America and Britain, with our partners, stand ready to negotiate, and to do so in good faith.  But in the absence of a willing partner, we will implement with vigor the sanctions package agreed by the United Nations Security Council, and in Europe we will be taking further steps as well.
Request a Fact Check
August 31, 2010
Today, old adversaries are at peace, and emerging democracies are potential partners.  New markets for our goods stretch from Asia to the Americas.  A new push for peace in the Middle East will begin here tomorrow.  Billions of young people want to move beyond the shackles of poverty and conflict.  As the leader of the free world, America will do more than just defeat on the battlefield those who offer hatred and destruction -- we will also lead among those who are willing to work together to expand freedom and opportunity for all people.
Request a Fact Check
September 23, 2010
These are some of the challenges that my administration has confronted since we came into office.  And today, I’d like to talk to you about what we’ve done over the last 20 months to meet these challenges; what our responsibility is to pursue peace in the Middle East; and what kind of world we are trying to build in this 21st century.
Request a Fact Check
September 23, 2010
As part of our effort on non-proliferation, I offered the Islamic Republic of Iran an extended hand last year, and underscored that it has both rights and responsibilities as a member of the international community.  I also said -- in this hall -- that Iran must be held accountable if it failed to meet those responsibilities.  And that is what we have done.
Request a Fact Check
September 23, 2010
Now let me be clear once more:  The United States and the international community seek a resolution to our differences with Iran, and the door remains open to diplomacy should Iran choose to walk through it.  But the Iranian government must demonstrate a clear and credible commitment and confirm to the world the peaceful intent of its nuclear program.
Request a Fact Check
September 24, 2010
To my fellow leaders from Africa, the Middle East, Europe and Asia -- your presence sends an unmistakable message to the Sudanese people and to their leaders that we stand united.  The Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended the civil war must be fully implemented.  The referenda on self-determination scheduled for January 9th must take place -- peacefully and on time, the will of the people of South Sudan and the region of Abyei must be respected, regardless of the outcome.
Request a Fact Check
November 13, 2010
I want to again thank President Medvedev on his cooperation with respect to Afghanistan.  There has been excellent transit cooperation in recent months and we think we can build on that in our discussions next week.  And on a range of international issues and hotspots from Sudan to the Middle East, we think that Russia has been a excellent partner.
Request a Fact Check
November 18, 2010
The New START treaty is also a cornerstone of our relations with Russia.  And this goes beyond nuclear security.  Russia has been fundamental to our efforts to put strong sanctions in place to put pressure on Iran to deal with its nuclear program.  It’s been critical in supporting our troops in Afghanistan through the Northern Distribution Network.  It’s been critical in working with us to secure all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world, and to enhance European security.
Request a Fact Check
November 19, 2010
Finally, let me say a few words about the need to ratify the New START treaty.  As I’ve said, this is a national security imperative for the United States.  We need to ratify New START to put in place on-the-ground inspections of Russian nuclear arsenals, to reduce our deployed weapons and launchers, and to build on our cooperation with Russia -- which has helped us put pressure on Iran and helped us to equip our mission in Afghanistan.
Request a Fact Check
January 25, 2011
Because of a diplomatic effort to insist that Iran meet its obligations, the Iranian government now faces tougher sanctions, tighter sanctions than ever before.  And on the Korean Peninsula, we stand with our ally South Korea, and insist that North Korea keeps its commitment to abandon nuclear weapons. 
Request a Fact Check
February 11, 2011
I will say it is remarkable to watch in the region how Iran is dealing with this.  We saw I think about a week or so ago they made some provocative statements about what these marches meant.  We now know what -- how they’re responding to the images that we see in Tahrir Square.  They are arresting people in Iran.  They are blocking international media outlets.  They are turning off the Internet.
Request a Fact Check
February 11, 2011
So for all of the empty talk about Egypt, I think if the Iranian government -- I think it’s up to the -- the Iranian government should allow the Iranian people to exercise the very same right of peaceful assembly and ability to demonstrate and communicate their desires.  I think we’ve all seen, again, their response.  The head of the Revolutionary Guard said today, “Seditionists are no more than a corpse.  We will severely crush any of their movements.”
Request a Fact Check
February 11, 2011
MR. GIBBS:  Well, as I mentioned earlier, I think there is quite a contrast between the way the government of Egypt and the people of Egypt are interacting, and the government of Iran is threatening its very own people.  I think if the government of Iran was as confident as they would have you believe in the statements that they put out, they would have nothing to fear with the peaceful demonstration like those that you’ve seen in Cairo and throughout Egypt.
Request a Fact Check
February 11, 2011
MR. GIBBS:  Well, look, I think we have all seen reports that -- over the past many days that there -- those in Iran have and want to march and demonstrate peacefully.  The government of Iran, again, has met those -- the concerns of its people with threatening to kill them.  Again, I think it speaks volumes as to what -- it speaks volumes to the grip that they have, or lack thereof, on the popular beliefs of their own people.
Request a Fact Check
February 11, 2011
MR. GIBBS:  Well, I don't -- look, we’re not interfering.  This is -- remember, this started with the government of Iran discussing what was happening in Egypt.  And I think probably a week or 10 days ago, I think I said to Stephen Collinson in question that if that's what they believe, then they wouldn’t have any problem letting their people demonstrate about the concerns that they have.
Request a Fact Check
February 11, 2011
Now we know they didn't really mean that.  Now we know that what they really are scared of is exactly what might happen.  They're scared of that, and they're threatening those that might do it with death.  It’s a strange -- to say the least -- reaction to a government and a military that -- governments and militaries are pledged to protect their citizens.  And it is clear that the government of Iran is quite scared of theirs.
Request a Fact Check
March 20, 2011
Today, we are seeing the struggle for these rights unfold across the Middle East and North Africa.  We’ve seen a revolution born out of a yearning for basic human dignity in Tunisia.  We’ve seen peaceful protestors pour into Tahrir Square -– men and women, young and old, Christian and Muslim.  We’ve seen the people of Libya take a courageous stand against a regime determined to brutalize its own citizens.  Across the region, we’ve seen young people rise up -– a new generation demanding the right to determine their own future.
Request a Fact Check
March 21, 2011
At the same time, Chile is assuming more a leadership role beyond the Americas.  As part of last year’s Nuclear Security Summit, Chile took the bold step of giving up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.  Chile is the first Latin American nation to join a new international effort to strengthen civil society groups that are under threat.  And as a member of the U.N. Human Rights Council, Chile has joined with us in standing up against human rights abuses in Iran and in Libya.
Request a Fact Check
March 22, 2011
It is in America’s national interest to participate in that because nobody has a bigger stake in making sure that there are basic rules of the road that are observed, that there is some semblance of order and justice -- particularly in a volatile region that's going through great changes like the Middle East -- than does the United States of America.
Request a Fact Check
March 28, 2011
Yes, this change will make the world more complicated for a time.  Progress will be uneven, and change will come differently to different countries.  There are places, like Egypt, where this change will inspire us and raise our hopes.  And then there will be places, like Iran, where change is fiercely suppressed.  The dark forces of civil conflict and sectarian war will have to be averted, and difficult political and economic concerns will have to be addressed.
Request a Fact Check
March 28, 2011
Born, as we are, out of a revolution by those who longed to be free, we welcome the fact that history is on the move in the Middle East and North Africa, and that young people are leading the way.  Because wherever people long to be free, they will find a friend in the United States.  Ultimately, it is that faith -- those ideals -- that are the true measure of American leadership.
Request a Fact Check
March 29, 2011
So we can go down the list domestically, and then we can talk internationally.  Obviously that's been on a lot of our minds lately.  And we are grateful to our men and women in uniform who have implemented so many difficult policies under such incredibly difficult conditions.    And whether it’s helping the people of Haiti or it’s helping the people of Japan, whether it is being on the right side of history in the Middle East and North Africa or making sure that innocents who are seeking their freedom aren't slaughtered by tyranny -- what we've been able to do is to once again form the kind of American leadership that brings people together, as opposed to drives them apart, and that renews old alliances and creates new coalitions.
Request a Fact Check
March 29, 2011
You know, I did a bunch of network interviews today to talk about what we’re doing in Libya and why what happens in the Middle East is so important to us, and why those images coming from Tahrir Square in Egypt speak directly to who we are as a people, and that ultimately our long-term security will be because a new generation of leadership in that region recognizes we aspire for them to have opportunity and to be successful.
Request a Fact Check
March 29, 2011
The second thing I want to say is, obviously we gather in this wonderful setting, in historic Harlem, on a day in which we’re all thinking about our troops overseas and some very difficult challenges around the world.  On one side of the world we've got one of our closest allies that's going through just an unbelievable catastrophe, and we are doing everything we can to help them.  Then in the Middle East and North Africa we are seeing the kind of transformative moment that typically only comes once in a generation, and we are having to make sure that we help to bend history in a way that is good for the people there and ultimately good for the American people.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2011
We meet here at a tumultuous time for the world.  In a matter of months, we’ve seen regimes toppled.  We've seen democracy take root in North Africa and in the Middle East.  We’ve witnessed a terrible earthquake, a catastrophic tsunami, a nuclear emergency that has battered one of our strongest allies and closest friends in the world’s third-largest economy.  We’ve led an international effort in Libya to prevent a massacre and maintain stability throughout the broader region. 
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2011
The truth is, none of these gimmicks, none of these slogans made a bit of difference.  When gas prices finally did fall, it was mostly because the global recession had led to less demand for oil.  Companies were producing less; the demand for petroleum went down; prices went down.  Now that the economy is recovering, demand is back up.  Add the turmoil in the Middle East, and it’s not surprising that oil prices are higher.  And every time the price of a barrel of oil on the world market rises by $10, a gallon of gas goes up by about 25 cents.
Request a Fact Check
April 19, 2011
Now, I wish I could tell you that there was some easy, simple solution to this. It is true that a lot of what’s driving oil prices up right now is not the lack of supply. There’s enough supply. There’s enough oil out there for world demand. The problem is, is that oil is sold on these world markets, and speculators and people make various bets, and they say, you know what, we think that maybe there’s a 20 percent chance that something might happen in the Middle East that might disrupt oil supply, so we’re going to bet that oil is going to go up real high. And that spikes up prices significantly.
Request a Fact Check
April 21, 2011
Internationally, we were seeing changes around the world -- countries like China and India rising; areas like the Middle East becoming less stable; the world shrinking because of technology, much of it invented right here in this region. And so I think we understood that we were going to have to adapt in some fundamental way in order to make sure that our kids and our grandkids ended up inheriting the kind of America that we inherited.
Request a Fact Check
April 21, 2011
We’re not finished when it comes to energy.  Right now we’ve got $4-a-gallon gas, and most of the people under this tent don’t have to worry about that.  But for the average person who has to drive 50 miles to work and can’t afford to buy the Tesla -- it’s hammering them.  It’s hurting them.  So there’s a huge economic imperative.  There’s a national security imperative, as well, because we see what’s happening in the Middle East and we understand that a finite resource that is primarily located in a very unstable part of the world is not good for our long-term future.
Request a Fact Check
April 28, 2011
As people across the Middle East and North Africa seek to determine their own destiny, we must ensure that America stands with those who seek their universal rights, and that includes continuing to support the international effort to protect the Libyan people.  And here at home, as we make the hard decisions that are needed to reduce America’s debt, we cannot compromise our ability to defend our nation or our interests around the world.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
We’re joined by Israel’s representative to the United States, Ambassador Michael Oren.    And we’re joined by one of my top advisors on Israel and the Middle East for the past four years and who I know is going to be an outstanding ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro.    Dan has always been a close and trusted advisor and friend, and I know that he will do a terrific job.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
Now, I’m not here to subject you to a long policy speech.  I gave one on Thursday in which I said that the United States sees the historic changes sweeping the Middle East and North Africa as a moment of great challenge, but also a moment of opportunity for greater peace and security for the entire region, including the State of Israel.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.    Here in the United States, we’ve imposed the toughest sanctions ever on the Iranian regime.    At the United Nations, under our leadership, we’ve secured the most comprehensive international sanctions on the regime, which have been joined by allies and partners around the world.  Today, Iran is virtually cut off from large parts of the international financial system, and we’re going to keep up the pressure.  So let me be absolutely clear –- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. 
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
Its illicit nuclear program is just one challenge that Iran poses.  As I said on Thursday, the Iranian government has shown its hypocrisy by claiming to support the rights of protesters while treating its own people with brutality.  Moreover, Iran continues to support terrorism across the region, including providing weapons and funds to terrorist organizations.  So we will continue to work to prevent these actions, and we will stand up to groups like Hezbollah, who exercise political assassination and seek to impose their will through rockets and car bombs.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
I know that stating these principles -- on the issues of territory and security -- generated some controversy over the past few days.    I wasn’t surprised.  I know very well that the easy thing to do, particularly for a President preparing for reelection, is to avoid any controversy.  I don’t need Rahm to tell me that.  Don’t need Axelrod to tell me that.  But I said to Prime Minister Netanyahu, I believe that the current situation in the Middle East does not allow for procrastination.  I also believe that real friends talk openly and honestly with one another.    So I want to share with you some of what I said to the Prime Minister.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
And just as the context has changed in the Middle East, so too has it been changing in the international community over the last several years.  There’s a reason why the Palestinians are pursuing their interests at the United Nations.  They recognize that there is an impatience with the peace process, or the absence of one, not just in the Arab World -- in Latin America, in Asia, and in Europe.  And that impatience is growing, and it’s already manifesting itself in capitals around the world.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
But the march to isolate Israel internationally -- and the impulse of the Palestinians to abandon negotiations –- will continue to gain momentum in the absence of a credible peace process and alternative.  And for us to have leverage with the Palestinians, to have leverage with the Arab States and with the international community, the basis for negotiations has to hold out the prospect of success.  And so, in advance of a five-day trip to Europe in which the Middle East will be a topic of acute interest, I chose to speak about what peace will require.
Request a Fact Check
May 22, 2011
For so long as there are those across the Middle East and beyond who are standing up for the legitimate rights and freedoms which have been denied by their governments, the United States will never abandon our support for those rights that are universal.       And so long as there are those who long for a better future, we will never abandon our pursuit of a just and lasting peace that ends this conflict with two states living side by side in peace and security.  This is not idealism; it is not naïveté.  It is a hard-headed recognition that a genuine peace is the only path that will ultimately provide for a peaceful Palestine as the homeland of the Palestinian people and a Jewish state of Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people.    That is my goal, and I look forward to continuing to work with AIPAC to achieve that goal.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
As historic change unfolds across the Middle East and North Africa, we agree that the pursuit of self-determination must be driven by the peoples of the region and not imposed from the outside.  But we are both committed to doing everything that we can to support peoples who reach for democracy and leaders who implement democratic reform.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
As increasing tensions in the Abyei region threaten to derail Sudan’s comprehensive peace agreement, we’re working closely together to encourage the parties to recommit to a peaceful resolution to the crisis, and calling on the rapid reinforcement of the U.N.’s peacekeeping presence in the region.       We also reviewed our close cooperation when it comes to countering terrorist threats, preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of their delivery to states like Iran, and our unrelenting efforts to keep our people safe.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
And that, in the end, is why the peace process in Northern Ireland was successful, because both sides had some understanding of what the other side needed for some dignity and for some peace.  And that is what we badly need right now in the Middle East.  And I think the President’s speech has been a good step forward in really helping to make that happen.  Thank you.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
Second, we must reach a conclusion to the Arab-Israel peace process.  Again, I congratulated the President on his recent speech on the Middle East, which was bold, it was visionary, and it set out what is needed in the clearest possible terms -- an end to terror against Israelis and the restoration of dignity to the Palestinians; two states living side by side and in peace.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
Together, we have met great challenges.  But as we enter this new chapter in our shared history, profound challenges stretch before us.  In a world where the prosperity of all nations is now inextricably linked, a new era of cooperation is required to ensure the growth and stability of the global economy.  As new threats spread across borders and oceans, we must dismantle terrorist networks and stop the spread of nuclear weapons, confront climate change and combat famine and disease.  And as a revolution races through the streets of the Middle East and North Africa, the entire world has a stake in the aspirations of a generation that longs to determine its own destiny.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
We also share a common interest in stopping the spread of nuclear weapons.  Across the globe, nations are locking down nuclear materials so they never fall into the wrong hands -- because of our leadership.  From North Korea to Iran, we’ve sent a message that those who flaunt their obligations will face consequences -– which is why America and the European Union just recently strengthened our sanctions on Iran, in large part because of the leadership of the United Kingdom and the United States.  And while we hold others to account, we will meet our own obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and strive for a world without nuclear weapons.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
We share a common interest in resolving conflicts that prolong human suffering and threaten to tear whole regions asunder.  In Sudan, after years of war and thousands of deaths, we call on both North and South to pull back from the brink of violence and choose the path of peace.  And in the Middle East, we stand united in our support for a secure Israel and a sovereign Palestine.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
We do these things because we believe not simply in the rights of nations; we believe in the rights of citizens.  That is the beacon that guided us through our fight against fascism and our twilight struggle against communism.  And today, that idea is being put to the test in the Middle East and North Africa.  In country after country, people are mobilizing to free themselves from the grip of an iron fist.  And while these movements for change are just six months old, we have seen them play out before -– from Eastern Europe to the Americas, from South Africa to Southeast Asia.
Request a Fact Check
May 25, 2011
Let there be no doubt:  The United States and United Kingdom stand squarely on the side of those who long to be free.  And now, we must show that we will back up those words with deeds.  That means investing in the future of those nations that transition to democracy, starting with Tunisia and Egypt -– by deepening ties of trade and commerce; by helping them demonstrate that freedom brings prosperity.  And that means standing up for universal rights -– by sanctioning those who pursue repression, strengthening civil society, supporting the rights of minorities.       We do this knowing that the West must overcome suspicion and mistrust among many in the Middle East and North Africa -– a mistrust that is rooted in a difficult past.  For years, we’ve faced charges of hypocrisy from those who do not enjoy the freedoms that they hear us espouse.  And so to them, we must squarely acknowledge that, yes, we have enduring interests in the region -– to fight terror, sometimes with partners who may not be perfect; to protect against disruptions of the world’s energy supply.  But we must also insist that we reject as false the choice between our interests and our ideals; between stability and democracy.  For our idealism is rooted in the realities of history -– that repression offers only the false promise of stability, that societies are more successful when their citizens are free, and that democracies are the closest allies we have.
Request a Fact Check
May 26, 2011
We've worked together on issues like Iran sanctions.  We've worked together on a range of international development opportunities.  And obviously we continue to work together very closely in terms of security in East Asia, whether that's issues of how North Korea operates and making sure that they actually implement a denuclearization process, or thinking about the long-term security structures in East Asia.
Request a Fact Check
May 26, 2011
And we are fully aware of the various issues in the world such as the Middle East and North Africa, and Iran and Syria, and Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And Japan will continue to pursue our efforts in those areas, including in our assistance to Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And where we can, we will provide assistance and we would like work together with the United States on these issues.
Request a Fact Check
May 26, 2011
We’re implementing the New START treaty.  We’re cooperating on nonproliferation, on nuclear security, on intelligence and counterterrorism.  We’re enforcing strong sanctions on Iran.  And we’re cooperating on Afghanistan, where Russia has been very helpful in establishing supply lines for our troops there.
Request a Fact Check
May 26, 2011
We also discussed the situation in the Middle East and North Africa, and shared our ideas about how we can manage the transition process that’s taking place throughout the region in a way that enhances prosperity and opportunity for people there and ensures stability and resolves conflicts in a peaceful way.
Request a Fact Check
May 26, 2011
We have talked of Middle East and North Africa.  We’ll continue the discussions, especially in the framework of G20.  We have dealt with settling the Iran issue.  We also talked of the necessity and we have emphasized the necessity of improving economic cooperation between our countries and stepping up Russia’s WTO accession.  I hope we’ll be able to conclude this process finally.  But we need motivation and impetus for that.  And we have agreed as a result of these talks to instruct respectively our teams.
Request a Fact Check
May 27, 2011
France is our oldest ally and continues to be one of our closest allies.  And as President Sarkozy indicated, we had an enormous convergence of approaches and views on the challenges that we face around the world.  We agreed that the changes that are taking place in the Middle East and North Africa make the pursuit of peace between Israelis and Palestinians more urgent, not less.  And we agreed to coordinate closely in encouraging the parties to sit down around the negotiating table and to resolve this issue in a way that creates a Palestinian state that is sovereign and an Israeli state that is secure, the two states living side by side in peace.
Request a Fact Check
May 28, 2011
The United States is also fully committed to supporting safe nuclear power generation in Poland, and we’re prepared to offer our expertise of the largest and safest nuclear power industry in the world.    And finally we discussed the issue of how jointly we can promote democracy.  The session that I had this morning with democracy promotion experts, including many of the founders of Solidarity, who recently traveled to Tunisia to share their advice and assistance, is just a symbol of why Poland is so important.  It has gone through what many countries want to now go through, and has done so successfully.  And so the United States wants to work with Poland, and we welcome their leadership in reaching out to North Africa and the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
May 28, 2011
And, , you’ve talked a lot this week about inspiration -- inspiration in Northern Ireland for the Middle East peace process; inspiration in Eastern Europe for the Arab Spring.  I wonder if you take home with you also some cautionary lessons about the challenges in the experience here and in Northern Ireland, and what you can do as President to maintain that Emersonian enthusiasm at a time of fiscal austerity in the U.S. and Europe?
Request a Fact Check
May 28, 2011
I was struck by something that the president of the Senate or the head of the Senate here in Poland mentioned during our democracy forum, that he had lived through three waves of revolutionary transformation in his lifetime.  He saw the shift from military rule to democracy in Latin America.  He saw those changes then take place with incredible speed when the Berlin Wall came down and the Iron Curtain was pulled asunder.  And now he’s seeing what’s happening in North Africa the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
May 28, 2011
And in the dinner last night, I thought something very interesting was said -- these are Central European leaders and presidents from all across the region.  One of them said, there were those who said we could not handle democracy, that our cultures were too different.  But America had faith in us.  And so now we want to join with America and have faith in those in the Middle East and in North Africa.  Even if some don't think that they can handle democracy, or that their cultures are too different, our experience tells us something different.
Request a Fact Check
May 28, 2011
We’re looking forward to being a strong partner with them because when we work together, that's a force multiplier.  The more we have strong leaders like Poland working alongside us, the more successful we can be in dealing with North Africa and the Middle East, and encouraging the best impulses in that region. And that's going to be good for all of our security.
Request a Fact Check
May 28, 2011
I want to tell you -- and this is what we declared during our conversation -- that our experience, the certainty that it worked, can be translated and we can translate this, and we do this when we think about those nations whose leaders you met yesterday -- but also those who are waiting for freedom and democracy for even longer.  I am speaking here about the region of North Africa and some of the countries of the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
May 30, 2011
They both have something else.  For the first time, the Chairman and Vice Chairman will have the experience of leading combat operations in the years since 9/11.  Two moments in particular speak to this leadership.  On the morning of September 11, 2001, the Enterprise was returning home from the Persian Gulf when word came of the attacks.  Rather than wait for orders, Sandy took the initiative, reversed course, and put his ship and aircraft within range of Afghanistan by the next morning, setting the stage for the strikes that followed.  A few years later, as Marty’s 1st Armored Division was rotating out of Iraq, he suddenly got new orders.  He turned his division around, shifted to new parts of Iraq, and defeated an insurgent uprising -- a remarkable maneuver that has entered the annals of Army history.
Request a Fact Check
August 17, 2011
And some of those things are not in our control.  We couldn’t control the tsunami in Japan that disrupted supply chains.  We could not control what happened in the Middle East that drove up gas prices.  We don’t have complete control over what happens in Europe with their problems.  And all those things have affected our economy, but there are so many things that we’ve got control over right now that we could be doing to put people back to work.
Request a Fact Check
September 26, 2011
I hope everybody understands our biggest problem right now, part of the reason that this year, where at the beginning of the year, economists had estimated, and financial analysts had estimated that the economy was going to be growing at about 3.5 percent, and that has not happened, in part has to do with what happened in the Middle East and the Arab Spring, which disrupted energy prices and caused consumers to have to pull back because gas was getting so high; what's happening in Europe, which they have not fully healed from the crisis back in 2007 and never fully dealt with all the challenges their banking system faced. It's now being compounded by what's happening in Greece. So they're going through a financial crisis that is scaring the world. And they're trying to take responsible actions, but those actions haven't been quite as quick as they need to be.
Request a Fact Check
September 28, 2011
Well, obviously we’re going through the worst financial crisis and recession since the Great Depression. It has been a worldwide phenomenon -- it’s not just here in the United States.  And some of the challenges that we’ve had over the last several months actually have to do with the fact that in Europe we haven’t seen them deal with their banking system and their financial system as effectively as they needed to; the changes that have taken place in the Middle East sent oil prices up, and that gave a shock to the world economy.  So there are a lot of forces at work here that we have to address.
Request a Fact Check
November 29, 2011
On that score, I think it's important for me to just note that all of us, I think, are deeply disturbed by the crashing of the English embassy -- the embassy of the United Kingdom in Iran.  That kind of behavior is not acceptable.  And I strongly urge the Iranian government to hold those who are responsible to task.  They have a responsibility to protect diplomatic outposts.  That is a basic international obligation that all countries need to observe.  And for rioters, essentially, to be able to overrun the embassy and set it on fire is an indication that the Iranian government is not taking its international obligations seriously.
Request a Fact Check
November 30, 2011
Internationally, we've been managing I think an extraordinary period not just of two wars, which we're now winding down, but, as Jack alluded to, enormous tumult in the Middle East.  And so far, at least, what we've been able to do is manage it in a way that positions America to stand on the side of democracy, but also be very firm with respect to the security of our allies.  And obviously, no ally is more important than the state of Israel.
Request a Fact Check
November 30, 2011
In the Middle East, obviously it’s an enormous time of transition and there are going to be some bumpy moments along the way.  But we have positioned ourselves squarely on the side of freedom and democracy.  And we are I think in a position -- particularly as we end the war in Iraq and have all our troops home in time for the holidays this year, and as we begin to transition in Afghanistan -- we're in a position to help shape what, over the long term, could be a transformation in that region that benefits millions of people.  And we can do it even as we are foursquare insisting on Israel’s security.
Request a Fact Check
December 12, 2011
Q    Thank you, , and Mr. Prime Minister.  , I have two questions for you on the region.  In Syria, you have called for President Assad to step down over the killing of his people, but Prime Minister Maliki has warned that Assad’s removal could lead to a civil war that could destabilize the whole region.  I’m wondering if you’re worried that Iraq could be succumbing to Iran’s influence on this matter and perhaps helping to protect Assad.
Request a Fact Check
December 12, 2011
Even if there are tactical disagreements between Iraq and the United States at this point in how to deal with Syria, I have absolutely no doubt that these decisions are being made based on what Prime Minister Maliki believes is best for Iraq, not based on considerations of what Iran would like to see.
Request a Fact Check
December 14, 2011
Now, nine years ago, American troops were preparing to deploy to the Persian Gulf and the possibility that they would be sent to war.  Many of you were in grade school.  I was a state senator.  Many of the leaders now governing Iraq -- including the Prime Minister -- were living in exile.  And since then, our efforts in Iraq have taken many twists and turns.  It was a source of great controversy here at home, with patriots on both sides of the debate.  But there was one constant -- there was one constant:  your patriotism, your commitment to fulfill your mission, your abiding commitment to one another.  That was constant.  That did not change.  That did not waiver.
Request a Fact Check
December 16, 2011
Another grave concern -– and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -– is Iran’s nuclear program.  And that’s why our policy has been absolutely clear:  We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.    And that’s why we’ve worked painstakingly from the moment I took office with allies and partners, and we have imposed the most comprehensive, the hardest-hitting sanctions that the Iranian regime has ever faced.  We haven’t just talked about it, we have done it.  And we’re going to keep up the pressure.    And that’s why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table.  We have been clear.
Request a Fact Check
January 24, 2012
Let there be no doubt:  America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. 
Request a Fact Check
January 24, 2012
But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.
Request a Fact Check
January 24, 2012
As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana’a to Tripoli.  A year ago, Qaddafi was one of the world’s longest-serving dictators -– a murderer with American blood on his hands.  Today, he is gone.  And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change cannot be reversed, and that human dignity cannot be denied. 
Request a Fact Check
January 24, 2012
And we will safeguard America’s own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests.  Look at Iran.  Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program now stands as one.  The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent.
Request a Fact Check
February 23, 2012
We said that we've got to start developing American energy. We've doubled clean energy since I've been President.  And even as we've increased production of oil, we've recognized we've got to transition so that our kids and our grandkids are able to enjoy not only economic growth and not be dependent on what's happening in the Middle East or someplace else, but also we're able to protect the planet.
Request a Fact Check
February 23, 2012
You know there are no quick fixes to this problem.  You know we can’t just drill our way to lower gas prices.  If we’re going to take control of our energy future and can start avoiding these annual gas price spikes that happen every year -- when the economy starts getting better, world demand starts increasing, turmoil in the Middle East or some other parts of the world -- if we’re going to avoid being at the mercy of these world events, we’ve got to have a sustained, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy.  Yes, oil and gas, but also wind and solar and nuclear and biofuels, and more.
Request a Fact Check
February 23, 2012
So we’re focused on production.  That's not the issue.  And we’ll keep on producing more homegrown energy.  But here’s the thing -- it’s not enough.  The amount of oil that we drill at home doesn’t set the price of gas by itself.  The oil market is global; oil is bought and sold in a world market.  And just like last year, the single biggest thing that’s causing the price of oil to spike right now is instability in the Middle East -– this time around Iran.  When uncertainty increases, speculative trading on Wall Street increases, and that drives prices up even more.
Request a Fact Check
February 23, 2012
That's why we focused on education, and we've said that not only do we want to improve K through 12 so that every child is getting the basics -- math and science and English -- but we want everybody to be able to go to college.  And we took $60 billion that was going to -- that was being channeled to the banks as subsidies through the student loan program and we said let’s take that money and give it directly to students so that we could expand Pell grants and we could make sure that every -- young people who want to go to college can afford to do so.  Because right now, actually, student loan debt is higher than credit card debt in this country.  And it’s a huge burden on the next generation and we have to start relieving it.   We said, we’ve got to have an energy policy that makes sense and that includes developing oil and gas resources in this country, but it also means focusing on clean energy.  And here in Florida, we’ve seen enormous progress on things like solar and wind and biodiesel.  But we’ve got to do more -- making sure that our cars are more energy efficient, making sure that we’re not prey to every year right around this time oil spiking because something is going on in the Middle East, and our whole economy is suddenly vulnerable.   And we focused on making sure that our tax system is fair.  What I’ve said consistently is, look, I don’t like paying taxes any more than anybody else does and I’m the President.  Now, here’s the thing about being President, you pay every dime.  You don’t take advantage of any loopholes -- because everybody sees your income tax returns.  So I’m probably in the top bracket in every category.   But what I’ve said is Michelle and I have been so blessed, we can afford to do a little bit more to make sure that the next generation is able to come back up, is able to achieve their dreams the same way Michelle and I did.  Because we think about our stories.  I was raised by a single mom.  Michelle was raised by a blue-collar worker and a secretary.  My mother-in-law, even though she lives with us now, she's kept her home back in Chicago.  It’s now her house, but when they were growing up it was actually my mother-in-law’s sister’s house and Michelle’s family lived on the top floor, the second floor of this bungalow. It couldn’t have been more than 600 square feet where four people grew up.   And yet, she was able to go to a quality public school, go to Princeton, go to Harvard Law School, because somebody made an investment in her.  Somebody said, you know what, we want to make sure everybody has opportunity.  And that’s the same way I was able to get ahead, is because somebody made an investment in me.
Request a Fact Check
February 24, 2012
At the same time, there are other threats in the region, including the situation in Iran.  And I thanked the Prime Minister and the Danish government for their leadership role in applying the toughest sanctions we've ever seen coming out of the EU.  Difficult sanctions to apply, but we both agree that we're making progress and they are working in sending a message to Iran that it needs to take a different path if it wants to rejoin the international community, and that there is a expectation on the part of the world that they abide by their international obligations when it comes to their nuclear program.
Request a Fact Check
February 24, 2012
Another area that we discussed, as you’ve said, was Syria, which is quite the opposite situation.  It is horrendous what we see in Syria right now.  But I think it is also very, very true that we have worked together in that area.  We must continue that endeavor, and just today we have seen that, of the leadership of the League of Arab States, there has been a step forward in trying to put pressure on Syria, which is very, very important.  The same goes for Iran.
Request a Fact Check
March 25, 2012
We also had the opportunity to discuss the issue of Iran and its nuclear program.  I expressed to the Prime Minister once again that I believe there is a window of time to resolve this question diplomatically, but that window is closing.  And it's absolutely critical for us to be able to move forward in an effective way, in a serious way, in concert based on negotiations through the P5-plus-1 and other channels, to ensure that Iran abides by its international obligations, which also then assures them the right to engage in peaceful nuclear power.  I very much appreciate the Prime Minister's insights obviously as a neighbor of Iran and as someone who is interested in seeing this issue resolved in a peaceful fashion.
Request a Fact Check
March 25, 2012
On my return from South Korea I will be visiting Iran, specifically on the issue of Syria.  And I was hoping that we would have a chance to discuss that aspect as well, which we did today.  And there are also developments in Iran which were important which we wanted to discuss, and those have also been discussed in our meeting.
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
PRESIDENT HU:  (As interpreted.)  A month ago, Vice President Xi Jinping made a successful visit to the United States.  I asked him to hand to the President my reply to earlier letter, and I want to thank the American side for the warm hospitality and for all the arrangements made for his visit.   Now I'd like to talk to President Obama.   PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, , first of all, I’d like to say -- (inaudible) -- you and your delegation.  And I think that the fact that we have met 11 times during the course of my presidency is an indication of the importance that both of us place on strong U.S.-China relations.   I am very pleased to hear that Vice President Xi had a wonderful visit.  We very much enjoyed hosting him in the United States, and he did deliver your letter, which I appreciated very much.   I think this is an excellent opportunity for us to discuss a wide range of issues.  First of all, the fact that we are at a nuclear security summit, following up on our discussions in Washington two years ago, shows the progress that the international community has made in preventing nuclear proliferation and making sure that we’ve secured nuclear materials.  And I know that’s in the interest of both the United States and China.   I think this is also an opportunity to build on the excellent cooperation and dialogue across all the dimensions of our relationship that we’ve been able to establish over the last three years.  So I’m looking forward to discussing economic and commercial issues, how we can continue to expand trade and make sure that there is strong mutual understanding about the potential benefits of commerce between our two nations, in accordance with the international rules and norms.   It also gives us an opportunity to talk about a wide range of international issues.  Obviously of great importance to us and I know to you as well, the situation in North Korea and the situation in Iran -- we both have an interest in making sure that international norms surrounding non-proliferation and preventing destabilizing nuclear weapons is very important; issues like Sudan, where we both have an interest in ensuring peace and stability and development in a previously war-torn region of the world; the situation in the Middle East.  In all of these issues, I think cooperation and coordination between the United States and China is very important not only to the interest of our two countries but to the interest of the world.   And so I’m looking forward as always to a constructive, frank, and productive meeting that can ultimately benefit both the peoples of China and the peoples of the United States.   END 3:36 P.M. KST
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
2:27 P.M. KST   PRESIDENT OBAMA:  It is wonderful to see once again President Nazarbayev from Kazakhstan.  And I want to first of all congratulate him on his leadership for the issues that are going to be discussed over the next two days.   Twenty years ago, Kazakhstan made a decision not to have nuclear weapons.  And not only has that led to growth and prosperity in his own country, but he has been a model in efforts around the world to eliminate nuclear materials that could fall into the wrong hands.  So I very much appreciate his leadership.   In fact, one of the major deliverables that will take place at the summit is a outstanding effort to deal with nuclear materials that were carried over from the Soviet era.  Working with Russia and the United States, Kazakhstan has been able to secure those materials, and that makes us all safer.   I know that we’ll have an opportunity during this bilateral meeting to also discuss some of the other efforts that Kazakhstan has made when it comes to highly-enriched uranium, plutonium, their efforts at helping to develop a international fuel bank that can lessen the need for countries to pursue their own enrichment capabilities.   So across the board, Kazakhstan has been a key leader on these issues and is appropriately going to be featured during the next two days at this nuclear security summit.   The close relationship between our two countries extends beyond just the nuclear security issue, so this meeting will give us an opportunity to discuss the cooperation that we have built over the last several years with respect to Afghanistan and the help we've received in supplying our troops and helping to assist the Afghan government.    We obviously have commercial tie as well, and we’ll be discussing how we can deepen those.  I’ll be interested in discussing with the President efforts to further expand democracy and human rights within Kazakhstan, which will help to lead to further growth and prosperity in the future.   And so I very much appreciate his leadership and his efforts.  And I look forward to continuing to strengthen the relationship between our two countries.    PRESIDENT NAZARBAYEV:  (As interpreted.)  Well, I'm very grateful for this opportunity to participate in this important summit in Seoul.  We are discussing a very crucial issue of nuclear security.  And I am very grateful to you, , for the invitation to participate at the Washington summit, and now we are here in Seoul to discuss a very important issue.   , I support your call to all nations to struggle for a nuclear-free world and we fully support the nuclear strategy of the United States, and we say that all the countries that support the Non-Proliferation Treaty will get the support of nuclear powers and will never be threatened by any nuclear state.  And I think this is very important.   You discussed in detail your plan -- the joint work that we carry out between our nations.  And Kazakhstan 20 years ago was the first country to close its nuclear test site -- in Semipalatinsk we voluntarily renounced our nuclear arsenal.  And you know very well that at that time, on the territory of Kazakhstan, there was 1,100 warheads were deployed on the intercontinental missiles.    And in the last years we have worked closely -- Russia, the United States and Kazakhstan -- to demolish the infrastructure that was left over on the polygon, and we did a lot to rehabilitate the part of the Kazakhstan territory that was radiated.  And the people of Kazakhstan who suffered a lot and who lost many lives in that tragedy, they appreciate that effort very much.   And we work very closely with the United States, and we have achieved a lot.  We work jointly on many projects.  About $20 billion U.S. dollars have been invested in the Kazakhstan economy so far.  And 80 percent of all foreign investments that were directed to Central Asia ended up in Kazakhstan.  And I always show this collaboration as a very shining and proud example of good collaboration.  And I talk to all the nuclear powers and those who are threshold countries, and I talked to the leaders of Iran and I explained that they can get better collaboration with the two countries and start to peace.   And of course we work very closely on stopping terrorism, on Afghanistan, and the issues of transportation and transit through the territory of Kazakhstan that we discussed two years ago.   And, , we hope that the good and strong relations between us and the United States will strengthen further in the future, especially in economics and politics.  And we're ready to work shoulder to shoulder on this particular issue of nuclear safety and in other -- all of the issues that we believe that will involve our part of the world.   PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you, everybody.   END 2:39 P.M. KST
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
1:01 P.M. KST   PRESIDENT MEDVEDEV:  (As interpreted.)  So I would like to start by saying, once again, that together with my friend and colleague Barack Obama, we had a very substantial discussion of different issues of our agenda of bilateral cooperation between the United States and Russia.   I told Barack that despite the fact that reset that has been largely debated over the past three years get different assessments, I still believe that it was an extremely useful exercise, and we probably enjoyed the best level of relations between the United States and Russia during those three years than ever during the previous decades.  And we managed to achieve a lot in various areas.  First and foremost, that was the New START Treaty that was signed.  And we also managed to establish close cooperation on the most sensitive international issues.   And I would like to especially thank the U.S. President for his huge work and huge support in Russia's accession to the WTO.  In my view, that was an extremely important topic, and I hope that we will be able to achieve similar successes in resolving remaining issues, such as the revoke of Jackson-Vanik amendment.   Lots remains to be done, of course, in terms of trade and economic relations.  We need to bring them to the new level through increasing the volume of trade and raising the general level and pace of cooperation.  And I believe that it would serve the interests of the U.S. companies and the U.S. citizens, especially now that the global economy is experiencing the turbulent times.   We, of course, as usual, discussed various international issues, including the most difficult ones, such as Syria.  Yesterday, I had a very good meeting with the special envoy of the U.N. Secretary General, Mr. Annan, and like I told the U.S. President, we believe that his mission is very good and we hope that he will be able to reach good results, and to somewhat appease, at least initially, the situation, and would help to establish communication between various public groups and forces that exist in Syria.  And yesterday, I expressed my every support to Mr. Annan.   Anyways, we need to make sure that we not end up in greater problems than we already have, and that the threat of the civil war is averted, that it does not become reality, and that this mission would lead to dialogue between all the groups that exist in the country and government authorities.   Of course, we also spoke about the situation in the Middle East.  We touched upon the Iranian nuclear program, the North Korean nuclear program, other sensitive issues -- Afghanistan cooperation.  So I guess we touched upon all main issues and gave all main positions.   Of course, we also spoke about the missile defense.  I believe we still have time; time hasn't run out.  And now we need to discuss and cooperate on various aspects on European missile defense.  I believe such discussion could be more active.  Now, in my view, time has come for discussions between technical aspects and, of course, we remain at our own positions, both the United States and Russian Federation.  But I believe we still have time to agree on a balanced solution, and I believe that the good experience Barack and myself have gained while working on the START Treaty will help us and be very useful when finding solution to this very difficult problem.   And of course, Barack, I would like to take the opportunity to say how much I enjoyed the cooperation we had with you.  And I believe that it really was the highlight of the previous years.  And due to the high level of cooperation, we managed to resolve various complicated issues bilaterally -- national agenda.  And I hope that the same high level of our relations will remain between the United States of America and the Russian Federation when the new President steps in office.    And I would like to -- I already invited you to visit Russia.  I understand that this year will be difficult for you, since it's an election year.  But still, I hope that you will be able to come.  I already invited you to my hometown, St. Petersburg, so I would like to take the occasion to reiterate my invitation on behalf of myself and President-elect Vladimir Putin.   PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you.  Well, first of all, let me just say that the last three years of my work with President Medvedev has been extremely productive.  And he listed some of the achievements that has resulted from this work -- the New START Treaty reduces our nuclear stockpiles in ways that can help create greater peace and security not just for our countries but for the world, and is consistent with our obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.   Russia's ascension into the WTO can open up trade and commerce between our two countries that can create jobs and economic growth for both Russians and Americans.  And as Dmitry mentioned, we think it's going to be very important for us to address Jackson-Vanik so that American businesses can fully take advantage of an open and liberalized Russian market.   It is true that there have been times where we have had to manage tensions between our countries, and that's to be expected.  Obviously, there are always tensions between countries, and that's certainly true given the long history of the Cold War between our two countries.  But what I think we've been able to do is to ensure that rather than look backwards, we've been looking forwards.   Sorry, translator, I forgot you were there.    I got on a roll.   Moving forward, we've got more work to do between our two countries.  Dmitry identified some areas of continued friction -- missile defense being an example.  And what we've agreed to is to make sure that our teams, at a technical level, are in discussions about how some of these issues can be resolved.   The bilateral presidential commission that was chaired by Foreign Minister Lavrov and Secretary of State Clinton, will be working actively around a number of the trade and commercial issues, not only with respect to WTO but how we can more vigorously expand the kind of investment and the kind of cooperation on the economic front that can benefit both Russia and the United States.    On the international front, we agreed that, as two of the world’s leading powers, it’s absolutely critical that we communicate effectively and coordinate effectively in responding to a wide range of situations that threaten world peace and security.    So on Syria, although there had been some differences over the last several months, we both agree that we should be supportive of Kofi Annan’s efforts to try to end some of the bloodshed that’s taking place within Syria and move towards a mechanism that would allow for the Syrian people ultimately to have a representative and legitimate government that serves their interest.   On Iran, we agree that the P5-plus-1 talks with Iran that should be announced soon offer us an opportunity to resolve diplomatically the critical issue of ensuring that Iran is abiding by its international obligations, that will allow it to rejoin the community of nations, and have peaceful uses of nuclear energy while not developing nuclear weapons.   And with respect to North Korea, we are going to be both sending messages to North Korea that they should not go forward with this missile launch, which would violate existing U.N. Security Council resolutions.  And our hope is, is that we can resolve these issues diplomatically.   So let me just say that at a time of great challenges around the world, cooperation between the United States and Russia is absolutely critical to world peace and stability.  And I have to say that I could not have asked for a better partner in forging that strong relationship than Dmitry.  I am confident that in his new role he is going to continue to have an outstanding influence in world affairs and help to continue to deepen and improve the relationship between our two countries.    I wish him all the best.  And I would love to visit St. Petersburg.  He is absolutely right that my next visit to Russia will undoubtedly be after my election.      Good luck, my friend.   END   1:23 P.M. KST
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
10:32 A.M. KST   PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you.    Thank you so much.  Thank you.    Please, thank you very much.    To President Park, faculty, staff and students, thank you so much for this very warm welcome.  It is a great honor to be here at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.    I want to thank Dr. Park for, a few moments ago, making me an honorary alumni of the university.    I know that this school has one of the world’s finest foreign language programs -- which means that your English is much better than my Korean.    All I can say is, kamsa hamnida.      Now, this is my third visit to the Republic of Korea as President.  I've now been to Seoul more times than any other capital -- except for Washington, D.C.,  of course.  This reflects the extraordinary bonds between our two countries and our commitment to each other.  I’m pleased that we’re joined by so many leaders here today, Koreans and Americans, who help keep us free and strong and prosperous every day.  That includes our first Korean-American ambassador to the Republic of Korea -- Ambassador Sung Kim.        I’ve seen the deep connections between our peoples in my own life -- among friends, colleagues.  I’ve seen it so many patriotic Korean Americans, including a man born in this city of Seoul, who came to America and has dedicated his life to lifting up the poor and sick of the world.  And last week I was proud to nominate him to lead the World Bank -- Dr. Jim Yong Kim.       I’ve also seen the bonds in our men and women in uniform, like the American and Korean troops I visited yesterday along the DMZ -- Freedom’s Frontier.  And we salute their service and are very grateful for them.  We honor all those who have given their lives in our defense, including the 46 brave souls who perished aboard the Cheonan two years ago today.  And in their memory we reaffirm the enduring promise at the core of our alliance -- we stand together, and the commitment of the United States to the defense and the security of the Republic of Korea will never waver.    Most of all, I see the strength of our alliance in all of you.  For decades, this school has produced leaders -- public servants, diplomats, businesspeople -- who’ve helped propel the modern miracle that is Korea-- transforming it from crushing poverty to one of the world’s most dynamic economies; from authoritarianism to a thriving democracy; from a country focused inward to a leader for security and prosperity not only in this region but also around the world -- a truly “Global Korea.”    So to all the students here today, this is the Korea your generation will inherit.  And I believe there's no limits to what our two nations can achieve together.  For like your parents and grandparents before you, you know that the future is what we make of it.  And you know that in our digital age, we can connect and innovate across borders like never before -- with your smart phones and Twitter and Me2Day and Kakao Talk.    It’s no wonder so many people around the world have caught the Korean Wave, Hallyu.    Or consider this:  In advance of my visit, our embassy invited Koreans to send us your questions using social media.  Some of you may have sent questions.  And they called it, "Ask President Obama."  Now, one of you -- maybe it was you, maybe it was somebody else -- this is true -- asked this question:  “Have you posted, yourself, a supportive opinion on a website under a disguised name, pretending you are one of the supporters of President Obama?”    I hadn’t thought of this.    But the truth is I have not done this.  Maybe my daughters have.    But I haven’t done that myself.   So our shared future -- and the unprecedented opportunity to meet shared challenges together -- is what brings me to Seoul.  Over the next two days, under President Lee’s leadership, we’ll move ahead with the urgent work of preventing nuclear terrorism by securing the world’s nuclear materials.  This is an important part of the broader, comprehensive agenda that I want to talk with you about today -- our vision of a world without nuclear weapons.   Three years ago, I traveled to Prague and I declared America’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and to seeking a world without them.  I said I knew that this goal would not be reached quickly, perhaps not in my lifetime, but I knew we had to begin, with concrete steps.  And in your generation, I see the spirit we need in this endeavor -- an optimism that beats in the hearts of so many young people around the world.  It’s that refusal to accept the world as it is, the imagination to see the world as it ought to be, and the courage to turn that vision into reality.  So today, with you, I want to take stock of our journey and chart our next steps.   Here in Seoul, more than 50 nations will mark our progress toward the goal we set at the summit I hosted two years ago in Washington -- securing the world’s vulnerable nuclear materials in four years so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists.  And since then, nations -- including the United States -- have boosted security at nuclear facilities.    South Korea, Japan, Pakistan and others are building new centers to improve nuclear security and training.  Nations like Kazakhstan have moved nuclear materials to more secure locations.  Mexico, and just yesterday Ukraine, have joined the ranks of nations that have removed all the highly enriched uranium from their territory.  All told, thousands of pounds of nuclear material have been removed from vulnerable sites around the world.  This was deadly material that is now secure and can now never be used against a city like Seoul.   We’re also using every tool at our disposal to break up black markets and nuclear material.  Countries like Georgia and Moldova have seized highly enriched uranium from smugglers.  And countries like Jordan are building their own counter-smuggling teams, and we’re tying them together in a global network of intelligence and law enforcement.  Nearly 20 nations have now ratified the treaties and international partnerships that are at the center of our efforts.  And I should add that with the death of Osama bin Laden and the major blows that we’ve struck against al Qaeda, a terrorist organization that has actively sought nuclear weapons is now on the path to defeat.        So in short, the international community has made it harder than ever for terrorists to acquire nuclear weapons, and that has made us all safer.  We’re building an international architecture that can ensure nuclear safety.  But we’re under no illusions.  We know that nuclear material, enough for many weapons, is still being stored without adequate protection.  And we know that terrorists and criminal gangs are still trying to get their hands on it -- as well as radioactive material for a dirty bomb.  We know that just the smallest amount of plutonium -- about the size of an apple -- could kill hundreds of thousands and spark a global crisis.  The danger of nuclear terrorism remains one of the greatest threats to global security.   And that's why here in Seoul, we need to keep at it.  And I believe we will.  We’re expecting dozens of nations to announce over the next several days that they’ve fulfilled the promises they made two years ago.  And we’re now expecting more commitments -- tangible, concrete action -- to secure nuclear materials and, in some cases, remove them completely.  This is the serious, sustained global effort that we need, and it's an example of more nations bearing the responsibility and the costs of meeting global challenges.  This is how the international community should work in the 21st century.  And Korea is one of the key leaders in this process.   The United States will continue to do our part -- securing our own material and helping others protect theirs.  We’re moving forward with Russia to eliminate enough plutonium for about 17,000 nuclear weapons and turn it instead into electricity.  I can announce today a new agreement by the United States and several European partners toward sustaining the supply of medical isotopes that are used to treat cancer and heart disease without the use of highly enriched uranium.  And we will work with industry and hospitals and research centers in the United States and around the world, to recover thousands of unneeded radiological materials so that they can never do us harm.    Now, American leadership has been essential to progress in a second area -- taking concrete steps towards a world without nuclear weapons.  As a party to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, this is our obligation, and it’s one that I take very seriously.  But I believe the United States has a unique responsibility to act -- indeed, we have a moral obligation.  I say this as President of the only nation ever to use nuclear weapons.  I say it as a Commander-in-Chief who knows that our nuclear codes are never far from my side.  Most of all, I say it as a father, who wants my two young daughters to grow up in a world where everything they know and love can’t be instantly wiped out.   Over the past three years, we’ve made important progress.  With Russia, we’re now reducing our arsenal under the New START Treaty -- the most comprehensive arms control agreement in nearly 20 years.  And when we’re done, we will have cut American and Russian deployed nuclear warheads to their lowest levels since the 1950s.   As President, I changed our nuclear posture to reduce the number and role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy.  I made it clear that the United States will not develop new nuclear warheads.  And we will not pursue new military missions for nuclear weapons.  We’ve narrowed the range of contingencies under which we would ever use or threaten to use nuclear weapons.  At the same time, I’ve made it clear that so long as nuclear weapons exist, we’ll work with our Congress to maintain a safe, secure and effective arsenal that guarantees the defense not only of the United States but also our allies -- including South Korea and Japan.   My administration’s nuclear posture recognizes that the massive nuclear arsenal we inherited from the Cold War is poorly suited to today’s threats, including nuclear terrorism.  So last summer, I directed my national security team to conduct a comprehensive study of our nuclear forces.  That study is still underway.  But even as we have more work to do, we can already say with confidence that we have more nuclear weapons than we need.  Even after New START, the United States will still have more than 1,500 deployed nuclear weapons, and some 5,000 warheads.    I firmly believe that we can ensure the security of the United States and our allies, maintain a strong deterrent against any threat, and still pursue further reductions in our nuclear arsenal.   Going forward, we’ll continue to seek discussions with Russia on a step we have never taken before -- reducing not only our strategic nuclear warheads, but also tactical weapons and warheads in reserve.  I look forward to discussing this agenda with President Putin when we will meet in May.  Missile defense will be on the agenda, but I believe this should be an area of cooperation, not tension.  And I’m confident that, working together, we can continue to make progress and reduce our nuclear stockpiles.  Of course, we’ll consult closely with our allies every step of the way, because the security and defense of our allies, both in Europe and Asia, is not negotiable.      Here in Asia, we've urged China -- with its growing nuclear arsenal -- to join us in a dialogue on nuclear issues.  That offer remains open.  And more broadly, my administration will continue to pursue ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.  And after years of delay, it’s time to find a path forward on a new treaty that verifiably ends the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons -- ends it once and for all.   By working to meet our responsibilities as a nuclear power, we’ve made progress in a third area -- strengthening the global regime that prevents the spread of nuclear weapons.  When I came into office, the cornerstone of the world’s effort -- which is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty -- was fraying.  Iran had started spinning thousands of centrifuges.  North Korea conducted another nuclear test.  And the international community was largely divided on how to respond.   Over the past three years, we have begun to reverse that dynamic.  Working with others, we’ve enhanced the global partnership that prevent proliferation.  The International Atomic Energy Agency is now conducting the strongest inspections ever.  And we’ve upheld the basic bargain of the NPT:  Countries with nuclear weapons, like the United States and Russia, will move towards disarmament; countries without nuclear weapons will not acquire them; and all countries can have access to peaceful nuclear energy.    Because of these efforts, the international community is more united and nations that attempt to flout their obligations are more isolated.  Of course, that includes North Korea.    Here in Korea, I want to speak directly to the leaders in Pyongyang.  The United States has no hostile intent toward your country.  We are committed to peace.  And we are prepared to take steps to improve relations, which is why we have offered nutritional aid to North Korean mothers and children.    But by now it should be clear, your provocations and pursuit of nuclear weapons have not achieved the security you seek; they have undermined it.  Instead of the dignity you desire, you're more isolated.  Instead of earning the respect of the world, you've been met with strong sanctions and condemnation.  You can continue down the road you are on, but we know where that leads.  It leads to more of the same -- more broken dreams, more isolation, ever more distance between the people of North Korea and the dignity and the opportunity that they deserve.    And know this:  There will be no rewards for provocations.  Those days are over.  To the leaders of Pyongyang I say, this is the choice before you.  This is the decision that you must make.  Today we say, Pyongyang, have the courage to pursue peace and give a better life to the people of North Korea.    This same principle applies with respect to Iran.  Under the NPT, Iran has the right to peaceful nuclear energy.  In fact, time and again the international community -- including the United States -- has offered to help Iran develop nuclear energy peacefully.  But time and again Iran has refused, instead taking the path of denial, deceit and deception.  And that is why Iran also stands alone, as the only member of the NPT unable to convince the international community that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes -- the only member.  That’s why the world has imposed unprecedented sanctions, slowing Iran’s nuclear program.    The international community is now poised to enter talks with Iran’s leaders.  Once again, there is the possibility of a diplomatic resolution that gives Iran access to peaceful nuclear energy while addressing the concerns of the international community.  Today, I’ll meet with the leaders of Russia and China as we work to achieve a resolution in which Iran fulfills its obligations.    There is time to solve this diplomatically.  It is always my preference to solve these issues diplomatically.  But time is short.  Iran’s leaders must understand they, too, face a choice. Iran must act with the seriousness and sense of urgency  that this moment demands.  Iran must meet its obligations.    For the global response to Iran and North Korea’s intransigence, a new international norm is emerging:  Treaties are binding; rules will be enforced; and violations will have consequences.  We refuse to consign ourselves to a future where more and more regimes possess the world’s most deadly weapons.   And this brings me to the final area where we’ve made progress -- a renewed commitment to harnessing the power of the atom not for war, but for peaceful purposes.  After the tragedy at Fukushima, it was right and appropriate that nations moved to improve the safety and security of nuclear facilities.  We’re doing so in the United States.  It’s taking place all across the world.   As we do, let’s never forget the astonishing benefits that nuclear technology has brought to our lives.  Nuclear technology helps make our food safe.  It prevents disease in the developing world.  It’s the high-tech medicine that treats cancer and finds new cures.  And, of course, it’s the energy -- the clean energy that helps cut the carbon pollution that contributes to climate change.  Here in South Korea, as you know, as a leader in nuclear energy, you’ve shown the progress and prosperity that can be achieved when nations embrace peaceful nuclear energy and reject the development of nuclear arms.   And with rising oil prices and a warming climate, nuclear energy will only become more important.  That’s why, in the United States, we’ve restarted our nuclear industry as part of a comprehensive strategy to develop every energy source.  We supported the first new nuclear power plant in three decades.  We’re investing in innovative technologies so we can build the next generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants.  And we’re training the next generation of scientists and engineers who are going to unlock new technologies to carry us forward.   One of the great challenges they’ll face and that your generation will face is the fuel cycle itself in producing nuclear energy.  We all know the problem:  The very process that gives us nuclear energy can also put nations and terrorists within the reach of nuclear weapons.  We simply can’t go on accumulating huge amounts of the very material, like separated plutonium, that we’re trying to keep away from terrorists.    And that’s why we’re creating new fuel banks, to help countries realize the energy they seek without increasing the nuclear dangers that we fear.  That’s why I’ve called for a new framework for civil nuclear cooperation.  We need an international commitment to unlocking the fuel cycle of the future.  In the United States we’re investing in the research and development of new fuel cycles so that dangerous materials can’t be stolen or diverted.  And today I urge nations to join us in seeking a future where we harness the awesome power of the atom to build and not to destroy.   In this sense, we see how the efforts I’ve described today reinforce each other.  When we enhance nuclear security, we’re in a stronger position to harness safe, clean nuclear energy.  When we develop new, safer approaches to nuclear energy, we reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism and proliferation.  When nations, including my own, fulfill our responsibilities, it strengthens our ability to ensure that other nations fulfill their responsibilities.  And step by step, we come closer to the security and peace of a world without nuclear weapons.   I know that there are those who deride our vision.  There are those who say ours is an impossible goal that will be forever out of reach.  But to anyone who doubts the great progress that is possible, I tell them, come to Korea.  Come to this country, which rose from the ashes of war -- a country that rose from the ashes of war, turning rubble into gleaming cities.  Stand where I stood yesterday, along a border that is the world’s clearest contrast between a country committed to progress, a country committed to its people, and a country that leaves its own citizens to starve.    Come to this great university, where a new generation is taking its place in the world -- helping to create opportunities that your parents and grandparents could only imagine.  Come and see some of the courageous individuals who join us today -- men and women, young and old, born in the North, but who left all they knew behind and risked their lives to find freedom and opportunity here in the South.  In your life stories we see the truth -- Koreans are one people.  And if just given the chance, if given their freedom, Koreans in the North are capable of great progress as well.    Looking out across the DMZ yesterday, but also looking into your eyes today, I’m reminded of another country’s experience that speaks to the change that is possible in our world.  After a terrible war, a proud people was divided.  Across a fortified border, armies massed, ready for war.  For decades, it was hard to imagine a different future.  But the forces of history and hopes of man could not be denied.  And today, the people of Germany are whole again -- united and free.     No two places follow the same path, but this much is true:  The currents of history cannot be held back forever.  The deep longing for freedom and dignity will not go away.  So, too, on this divided peninsula.  The day all Koreans yearn for will not come easily or without great sacrifice.  But make no mistake, it will come.    And when it does, change will unfold that once seemed impossible.  And checkpoints will open and watchtowers will stand empty, and families long separated will finally be reunited.  And the Korean people, at long last, will be whole and free.   Like our vision of a world without nuclear weapons, our vision of a Korea that stands as one may not be reached quickly.  But from this day until then, and all the days that follow, we take comfort in knowing that the security we seek, the peace we want, is closer at hand because of the great alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea -- and because we stand for the dignity and freedom of all Koreans.    And no matter the test, no matter the trial, we stand together.  We work together.  We go together.  Katchi kapshida!    Thank you very much.    END                11:03 A.M. KST
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
It also gives us an opportunity to talk about a wide range of international issues. Obviously of great importance to us and I know to you as well, the situation in North Korea and the situation in Iran -- we both have an interest in making sure that international norms surrounding non-proliferation and preventing destabilizing nuclear weapons is very important; issues like Sudan, where we both have an interest in ensuring peace and stability and development in a previously war-torn region of the world; the situation in the Middle East. In all of these issues, I think cooperation and coordination between the United States and China is very important not only to the interest of our two countries but to the interest of the world.
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
By working to meet our responsibilities as a nuclear power, we’ve made progress in a third area -- strengthening the global regime that prevents the spread of nuclear weapons. When I came into office, the cornerstone of the world’s effort -- which is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty -- was fraying. Iran had started spinning thousands of centrifuges. North Korea conducted another nuclear test. And the international community was largely divided on how to respond.
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
This same principle applies with respect to Iran. Under the NPT, Iran has the right to peaceful nuclear energy. In fact, time and again the international community -- including the United States -- has offered to help Iran develop nuclear energy peacefully. But time and again Iran has refused, instead taking the path of denial, deceit and deception. And that is why Iran also stands alone, as the only member of the NPT unable to convince the international community that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes -- the only member. That’s why the world has imposed unprecedented sanctions, slowing Iran’s nuclear program.
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
The international community is now poised to enter talks with Iran’s leaders. Once again, there is the possibility of a diplomatic resolution that gives Iran access to peaceful nuclear energy while addressing the concerns of the international community. Today, I’ll meet with the leaders of Russia and China as we work to achieve a resolution in which Iran fulfills its obligations.
Request a Fact Check
March 26, 2012
On Iran, we agree that the P5-plus-1 talks with Iran that should be announced soon offer us an opportunity to resolve diplomatically the critical issue of ensuring that Iran is abiding by its international obligations, that will allow it to rejoin the community of nations, and have peaceful uses of nuclear energy while not developing nuclear weapons.
Request a Fact Check
March 29, 2012
That’s not the future that I want for America.  I don’t want folks like these back here and the folks in front of me to have to pay more at the pump every time that there’s some unrest in the Middle East and oil speculators get nervous about whether there’s going to be enough supply.  I don’t want our kids to be held hostage to events on the other side of the world.
Request a Fact Check
March 30, 2012
We still have to do more when it comes to energy, because as much progress as we've made over the last few years, the fact of the matter is, is that we still are importing too much oil and our economy is still subject to the whims of what happens in the Middle East.  And our environment is still captive to our addiction to fossil fuels.
Request a Fact Check
April 30, 2012
I also want to take this opportunity to commend the Prime Minister and Japan for showing such strong leadership with regard to Iran’s nuclear program.  The regime in Tehran is now feeling the economic screws tighten, and one of the reasons is that countries like Japan made the decision to reduce oil imports from Iran.  This is just one more example of how, despite challenging times at home, Japan has continued to serve as a model and a true global leader.
Request a Fact Check
May 21, 2012
Finally, NATO agreed to deepen its cooperation with partners that have been critical to alliance operations, as in Afghanistan and Libya.  Today’s meeting was unprecedented, Our 28 allies, joined by 13 nations from around the world -- Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and Asia.  Each of these countries has contributed to NATO operations in different ways -- military, political, financial -- and each wants to see us do more together.  To see the breadth of those countries represented in that room is to see how NATO has truly become a hub of global security.
Request a Fact Check
May 23, 2012
We’re leading on global security -- reducing our nuclear arsenal with Russia, even as we maintain a strong nuclear deterrent; mobilizing dozens of nations to secure nuclear materials so they never fall into the hands of terrorists; rallying the world to put the strongest sanctions ever on Iran and North Korea, which cannot be allowed to threaten the world with nuclear weapons.
Request a Fact Check
May 23, 2012
We’re leading on behalf of human dignity and on behalf of freedom -- standing with the people of the Middle East and North Africa as they seek their rights; preventing a massacre in Libya with an international mission in which the United States -- and our Air Force -- led from the front.    We’re leading global efforts against hunger and disease.  And we’ve shown our compassion, as so many airmen did in delivering relief to our neighbors in Haiti when they were in need and to our Japanese allies after the earthquake and tsunami.
Request a Fact Check
May 24, 2012
So this country is on the path towards more energy independence.  And that’s good for everybody.  It's good for people's pocketbooks; it's good for the environment; it's good for our national security.  We don’t want our economy dependent on something that happens on the other side of the world.  We don’t want every time there's a scare about war or some regime change in the Middle East that suddenly everybody here is getting socked and the whole economy is going down.
Request a Fact Check
May 29, 2012
Our final honoree is not here -- Shimon Peres, the President of Israel, who has done more for the cause of peace in the Middle East than just about anybody alive.  I’ll be hosting President Peres for a dinner here at the White House next month, and we’ll be presenting him with his medal and honoring his incredible contributions to the state of Israel and the world at that time.  So I’m looking forward to welcoming him.  And if it’s all right with you, I will save my best lines about him for that occasion.
Request a Fact Check
May 29, 2012
Madeleine Korbel Albright.  Madeleine Korbel Albright broke barriers and left an indelible mark on the world as the first female Secretary of State in the United States’ history.  Through her consummate diplomacy and steadfast democratic ideals, Secretary Albright advanced peace in the Middle East, nuclear arms control, justice in the Balkans, and human rights around the world.  With unwavering leadership and continued engagement with the global community, she continues her noble pursuit of freedom and dignity for all people.
Request a Fact Check
June 25, 2012
And we believe in an energy program that taps into American energy, but also makes sure that we're taking care of our environment and we're not subject to the whims of what happens in some country in the Middle East at any given moment.
Request a Fact Check
June 26, 2012
I've got a vision that says we'll grow our economy if we control our own energy sources so we're not dependent on what happens in the Middle East.  And that's why we've got to double down on clean energy -- wind power and solar power. And I've got a vision that says we grow best when our tax code makes sure that the wealthiest Americans are paying a little bit more in order to bring down our debt. 
Request a Fact Check
July 13, 2012
I’m running because I want to build not just the best energy policy in the world here in the United States, I also want us to take the lead in clean energy.  We’ve seen oil production go up.  We’re seeing natural gas production go up.  And we’ve doubled our investment and production in solar and wind and biodiesel.  I don't want us to be dependent on what happens in the Middle East for our energy.  I want us to develop homegrown energy. 
Request a Fact Check
July 16, 2012
So what we’ve said is, look, we are going to work with industry to establish best practices.  We are going to invest in the basic research and science required to make sure this is done safely and in a way that protects the public health.  And for responsible companies, they should be able to operate, make a profit, and we can all benefit and put people back to work.  But if you’re an irresponsible company that’s not doing the right thing, we’re going to hold you to account.  And that’s how we should develop this incredible resource -- which, by the way, if we do it properly, could end up changing the economics and politics globally of energy in a way that's actually very good for us, because we'll be less dependent on what happens in the Middle East and our economy will be less subject to the kinds of spikes that we saw earlier in the spring in terms of gas prices.  Thank you for the question. 
Request a Fact Check
July 19, 2012
We’ve stood by Israel’s side in the face of criticism.  Our military and intelligence cooperation has never been closer.  And obviously this is a moment of great uncertainty in the Middle East given what’s happening in Syria and what’s happening in other places.  So now is the time to make sure that we are doing everything we can to protect Israel’s security.  And I want you to know that that’s something that should transcend party.  That’s not a Republican or a Democratic issue.  That is an issue of how we work with one of our closest allies in the world that shares our values and believes in democracy. 
Request a Fact Check
July 23, 2012
We’re not just ending these wars; we’re doing it in a way that achieves our objectives.  Moreover, it’s allowed us to broaden our vision and begin a new era of American leadership.  We’re leading from Europe to the Asia Pacific, with alliances that have never been stronger.  We’re leading the fight against nuclear dangers.  We’ve applied the strongest sanctions ever on Iran and North Korea -- nations that cannot be allowed to threaten the world with nuclear weapons.    We’re leading on behalf of freedom -- standing with people in the Middle East and North Africa as they demand their rights; protecting the Libyan people as they rid the world of Muammar Qaddafi.
Request a Fact Check
Issue Position |

Romney has said it would be “unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon.” He has indicated he would use economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation to ensure the Islamic republic does not develop such a weapon, but he has not ruled out using military force.

During his 2008 campaign, Romney unveiled a plan designed to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions by imposing economic sanctions, isolating the country diplomatically, communicating with Iranian citizens about the consequences of going nuclear, enlisting the help of moderate Muslim states, and developing a comprehensive plan for dealing with Islamic jihadism throughout the world.

The former Massachusetts governor has accused President Obama of trying to “charm” Iran into compliance and has said that any agreements with the Middle Eastern nation will lead to disappointment, just as they have with North Korea.

Romney has described Iran’s leaders as the biggest global threat since the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

Endorse

Romney on Iran
97 Comments

Reader Endorsements

Mike Murillo

Mike Murillo I believe in his political views.

Alex Jastin Vang

Alex Jastin Vang We need a President that is willing to risk action. Iran is an unfriendly nation hell-bent on destroying America and Israel. We need to draw the red line and enforce it.

Bo L Boazy

Bo L Boazy I feel the reason is Obvious. One is too much their friend

Robert Hightower Jr

Robert Hightower Jr Romney: wipe 'em out. Iran has deserved destruction since'79. Obama: anti-jew.

Elliot Teplitsky-Bauer

Elliot Teplitsky-Bauer He is not a timid appeaser as out President. He understands what is at stake here. If diplomacy does not work, we need a strong hand to deal with the Iranian challenge. Our President does not have this hand...

Dennis London

Dennis London How can our adversaries respect our might after Bengazi! An absolute failure - BHO did not answer the 3am call...instead told our guys to STAND DOWN!

Devorah Nuneya

Devorah Nuneya They are too unstable.

Deborah Hvizdos

Deborah Hvizdos Obama is the worst President America has ever had. America is in a Depression & he has done nothing & will continue to do nothing to get the economy going again. Obama has not one clue about being President of ...See More

Kyle Vance

Kyle Vance Yes, that is what our president did and said when faced with tough military and political issues....I RAN, said the president, and then I RAN the military into the ground by cutting military funding.

Helen McReynolds

Helen McReynolds He will have BACKBONE when it comes time to decide on what should be done.

Wayne Grimsley

Wayne Grimsley Obama has no strong leadership qualities in regards to international relations.

Leslie Feliciano Massucco

Leslie Feliciano Massucco One of my highest endorsements is for Romney especially when we are talking about the issues with Iran, and the safety for the United States of America.

Nina Barron-Burke

Nina Barron-Burke The present administration is on the wrong track and honestly doesn't know how to deal with these radicals. Step aside Obama and let a real President Romney do the job you can't seem to accomplish.

Mary Allen

Mary Allen Romney understands that bullies must be treated firmly, Obama has only sought to appease them, Obama regurgitates Iran's anti-Semitic excuses. He panders to that hateful mindset.

Patricia Anthone

Patricia Anthone Obama states that the intelligence he's receiving on the progress of Iran's nuclear development may be trusted to give us adequate warning were they to develop the delivery vehicles they now lack. How can we trust that this is so ...See More

Anthony Zarrella

Anthony Zarrella We don't need to "deter" Iran from getting a nuke. We need to *stop* them from getting one. We need to remind the world that when America says something is "unacceptable" it's not a polite request.

Alla Torchinsky

Alla Torchinsky Romney will protect America interests, while Obama is kissing Arabs hands , and apologizing how bad are Americans I will never forget Obama hate for Israel, and how he never been to Israel, and how he wants to divide Israel. ...See More

Farmer Joe

Farmer Joe WHO IS FIRST ON THEIR LIST AND WHO'S SECOND

Elizabeth Marquez

Elizabeth Marquez Obama has done nothing to show me that he is capable. Look at the handling of Lybia, exactly he didn't handle anything. I do not expect him to hand small things but when they are life shattering, come on!

Securities Finance

Securities Finance There will be war if Iran is not stopped, and Obama has not stopped them with sanctions, which could never work.

Securities Finance

Securities Finance Sanctions have not worked. Israel is isolated. War will ensure if Iran is not stopped.

Hugh Jorgin

Hugh Jorgin We, as a Nation, need to be PROACTIVE and not REACTIVE!! I'm not saying start a war, but I am saying send a message that shows, We Ain't Playin'!!!

Ric Allen

Ric Allen It is time for a true American to take control and show the world we are still the Superpower.

Amy Cadena

Amy Cadena WE CAN'T HAVE OBAMA FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS AND WASTE TRILLIONS MORE IN BANKER DEBT...WE NEED A NEW START - OVER THE LAST YEAR I HAVE CHANGED MY OPINION TOWARDS ROMNEY....HE IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE THAT WILL ACTUALLY MAKE CHANGES ...See More

Linda Fugger Rice

Linda Fugger Rice HE IS NOT SWADDLING THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AND PROTECTING THEM FROM JUSTICE. NO ONE CAN SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT THE PROPHET "MUHAMMAD", GIVE ME A BREAK, WHILE AT HOME HE IS TRYING TO MAKE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HHS MANDATE AGAINST ...See More

Lee Varner

Lee Varner Obama is weak and leaves us unprotected from problems. Iran must not be allowed to complete this. Romney is strong.

Alex Quirk

Alex Quirk Is barack allowing (enabling) Iran to cause a Major War in the Middle East by not communicating with Israel?

Fatima Baeta

Fatima Baeta Romney is right on top of it. Romney will be firm. We've waited to long with Iran.

Securities Finance

Securities Finance Appeasement, apology, and surrender, coupled with abandonment of our allies including notably the Israelis, have led to huge vacuums of instability in the Mideast, and Iran is simply laughing at Obama as they merrily continue with their nuclear bomb plans. ...See More

Ann Lail

Ann Lail he does not need a telepropter to tell you what he knows. he is the one we need for PRESIDENT!!!!!

Without a doubt!! Obama hides his head in sand....pun intended!

Brian Barrett

Brian Barrett both seem to be relatively even on this. I do believe Mitt is more likely to follow through with force

Jani Greene Divers

Jani Greene Divers Iran needs to understand, without question, that the US will not allow them to obtain a nuclear weapon at any cost. I believe Mitt Romney will do just that. We have seen what our current administration has done; nothing but ...See More

Shaun Brown

Shaun Brown WE NEED TO GO TO WAR AND END IRAN

Baine Sumpin

Baine Sumpin just testing WaPo's censorship danger Wrong Excessive

Eric N. Coop

Eric N. Coop Romeny has a strong strategy, similar to Reagan's on how to contain Iran.

Celia Ann Godfrey

Celia Ann Godfrey Iran has been feed candy, they see a weak president and so they pander. Another thing, when a country is in debt like we are it makes them look weak, even Hillary said "our national debt is making us look ...See More

Jerry Margeta

Jerry Margeta simple the other guy had his chance and blew it

Keith Best

Keith Best Obama is in over his head, he proves it every day.

Melissa Harris Preissler

Melissa Harris Preissler He would never apologize to anyone in the Middle East.

Robert Scanlan

Robert Scanlan For his hard line on Iran's leadership.Romney recognizes what he is dealing with. Obama wants to go out and play ball with them hoping they will like himand all things will be agreeable. You cannot deal with radicals this way, ...See More

Kris Vanderford

Kris Vanderford Obama has shown weakness and indecisiveness when it come to the matters and events occurring in the Middle East. He has not exhibited any behavior that would lead me to believe that he would do all he can to protect ...See More

Kris Vanderford

Kris Vanderford Obama has shown weakness and indecisiveness when it come to the matters and events occurring in the Middle East. He has not exhibited any behavior that would lead me to believe that he would do all he can to protect ...See More

Richard Linthicum

Richard Linthicum Nuke em!!!!

Morgandy Barnett

Morgandy Barnett Israel is our only strong ally in the entire middle east. Obama borders on being hostile toward them. And I have seen NO progress from Obama with Iran in the last 4 years. I still can't believe Obama didn't support ...See More

Nancy Neff- Skrzyniarz

Nancy Neff- Skrzyniarz Iran is a danger.

Meredith Bianca

Meredith Bianca Obama has a track record of failure. Change was on the to-do list it just never got crossed off.

Maureen Wilson

Maureen Wilson Obama has failed at International Policies

Pamela Martin Hoyt

Pamela Martin Hoyt Dealing with Iran is CRUCIAL to the safety and security of Israel and ALL the Middle East. We must allow Israel to protect themselves and we MUST back them up. I don't understand Jews in this country who back OBAMA?????? ...See More

Ron Berry

Ron Berry Notice how this survey doesn't let you use the word i l l e g a l i m i g r ant!

Britton J. Holdaway

Britton J. Holdaway Personally, I'm more concerned about the long-run international issues of a resurgent Russia and a burgeoning China. I think that Iran is a more regional issue (albeit an important one) that shouldn't distract us from developments in Asia and Indonesia. ...See More

Ella Prejsler

Ella Prejsler He has correct standing on dealing with this country's government.

Damon Dees

Damon Dees Has any one seen the News lately? we have one true friend over there, and they are in harms way 24-7, we need to be with them 100% of the time!! has anything worked that this KNUCLE HEAD has done? ...See More

Jim Moon

Jim Moon Unacceptable, Key word.

Judith Madhavi Goldman

Judith Madhavi Goldman " Indeed---indeed, that is the question of the hour. Where does America stand? You see, when the friends or foes alike don't know the answer to that question, unambiguously and clearly, the world is likely to be a more dangerous ...See More

Gloria Jackson Bolden

Gloria Jackson Bolden The United States need to get tough with Iran and Mitt will do it.

Jacob LaBarge

Jacob LaBarge I think these last few days have made it blatantly OBVIOUS who would have a better foreign policy plan, and that is Mitt Romney in a landslide.

Daniel Danielson

Daniel Danielson Mitt Romney is smarter than Obama

Fred Uppe

Fred Uppe We need real firm leadership where Iran is concerned. To them Obama is a joke.

Maria Medero

Maria Medero Gov. Romney has experience. He will be surrounded by brilliant analysts who will always make the right decisions on behalf of the citizens of the U.S.

Rich Kasson

Rich Kasson O bama has continually displayed his lack of courage and knowledge regarding foreign affairs. Maybe he should stop apologizing to the World...but wait...Michelle is still not proud of this country...what a loser!!

Robert Forsberg

Robert Forsberg Iran has not been handled correctlly. we kicked out Egypt pres but left Iran kids to die. way to go BIG O.

Tracey Lindsay

Tracey Lindsay I believe Mitt will do the right thing , Im not saying go to war but, there could be a way to handel this beter and safe for all man kind.

Sandi Cantrell

Sandi Cantrell He is HONEST He is the BETTER person all the way around. I am an independant in the state of FL and my VOTE GOES TO ROMNEY

Suzette Hardman

Suzette Hardman Iran has almost tripled their nuclear capabilities (ability to make nuclear devices). Sanctions clearly have not worked. We need to stand behind Israel....and protect the country of Israel. Simple.

Pamela Hassebrock

Pamela Hassebrock Because Iran is a threat to America and the world. Mr. Obama talks alot of talk and three and a half years have proven he is just a talker. Mr. Romney is a doer and that's what this country needs.See More

Walt Keays

Walt Keays Gov. Romney is a MUCH stronger leader. The current administration has dropped the ball on this.

Sronger leadership

Craig Fletcher

Craig Fletcher Obama is weak, he has no back bone... Talk with Iran... come on... these people are talking about destroying our best and one of owr closest friend in this world... They are our allies..... we need to stand with them ...See More

Shela D Kelley-Sturgeon

Shela D Kelley-Sturgeon It appears Iran is not worried about the USA helping Israel or anyone else, get this problem under control, under Obama they can just go on doing what they want to.

Timothy Koreen

Timothy Koreen I believe that any country that is using Nuclear power to build weapons or even has a capability of building weapons and has proven to be a threat to other countries through terrorist threats should not be allowed to have ...See More

Sandy Larson- Gonzales

Sandy Larson- Gonzales Obama has let them obtain 20% plutonium, It will mean war. His policy of leading from behind may very well start WW3

Lewis Hemmerton

Lewis Hemmerton I don't endorse either of these clowns. I endorse Gary Johnson.

Orificio Grandal

Orificio Grandal Obama sucks

Susan H Boyle

Susan H Boyle The current plan is failing. The only reasonable choice is someone new.

Kay Webers

Kay Webers He has the intellect and ability to deal with iran.

Christopher Mullaney

Christopher Mullaney Iran is a theocracy and we should have no deals with that state. Their policies, mores and the tribale nature of the country is some thing we'll never really understand. I hope Mr. Romney keeps us out of that rarea.See More

Thomas Sweeney

Thomas Sweeney for the safety of Israel and the United States We cannot allow Iran to become a nuclear power

Betty Ford

Betty Ford Romney's approach leaves no question. He is forthright and solid.

Cortney Brewerton

Cortney Brewerton Iran is a direct threat to the USA and Israel. Obama's soft (aka wimpy) foreign policy approach and his unmistakable animus toward Israel has made the Middle east even less stable than it already was.

Anthony Thomas

Anthony Thomas If Obama was serious about stopping Iran, he might try supporting Israel in the middle east. Romney has the realistic, adult approach to this situation and should be supported.

Jane Walker

Jane Walker We need strong international leadership. Obama does not give me the feeling that he truly understands "hatred" toward Americans in this part of the world.

Bill Johnson

Bill Johnson Obama pandered to China for support on Iran and got nothing. Better to try a new approach.

Royal Sanders-James

Royal Sanders-James Obama is a con man who knows little to nothing about governing a country or maintaining world order

Alberto Pardo

Alberto Pardo It is simply a fact that Iran is getting a nuclear weapon. When it turns out that many of Iran's top 20 trading partners have received waivers from the sanctions, it is troubling to think exactly who the Obama administration ...See More

Chuck McCullah

Chuck McCullah Logic in recognizing who Iran is and what their goals really are. If you can't SEE the enemy, you will be either dominated, controlled, or led astray.

Wendy Wagner

Wendy Wagner Obama will not stand up to Iran. He will not stand with Israel. He would probably let Iran march over America. Mitt Romney at least recognizes that Israel is our devout ali in a region fought with those who would ...See More

Rebecca Perry Williamson

Rebecca Perry Williamson Sanctions and force. They won't listen unless they have consequences. Nuclear weapons can't be allowed in Iran.

Nick Thompson

Nick Thompson He's nice

Bryan K. Macklowe

Bryan K. Macklowe There is only so much that diplomacy and sanctions can do. At some point we have to ask ourselves if we are willing to do whatever is necessary to keep Iran from having nuclear weapons. Such capability in the hands ...See More

Jay Adams-Feuer

Jay Adams-Feuer Romney is not so idealistic and understands that the only thing some regimes understand is force. These last four years as we have been talking and sleeping, the Iranians are getting closer to building a bomb, and d Mahmoud Iwannajihad ...See More

Michael Gardner

Michael Gardner Barack Obama is an old Kenyan word for Jimmy Carter.

Mike Krakow

Mike Krakow Obama is a joke

Ok Nana

Ok Nana I STAND WITH ISRAEL AND ROMNEY!!

Robert Meyer

Robert Meyer obama says a lot of things but seldom are ther any results i simply do not trust obama.

Carolina Verdugo

Carolina Verdugo We need to be proactive to protect our allied countries.

Edward Gordon

Edward Gordon Obama's plan of pacifism has not worked (never has worked)and Mitt's strong stance will work.

Romney's Statements (29)

October 7, 2011
Will Iran be a fully activated nuclear weapons state, threatening its neighbors, dominating the world's oil supply with a stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz?  In the hands of the ayatollahs, a nuclear Iran is nothing less than an existential threat to Israel. Iran’s suicidal fanatics could blackmail the world.
Request a Fact Check
October 7, 2011
I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region. I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination. And I will again reiterate that Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon is unacceptable.
Request a Fact Check
October 7, 2011
I will begin organizing all of our diplomatic and assistance efforts in the greater Middle East under one official with the authority and accountability necessary to train all our soft power resources on ensuring that the Arab Spring does not fade into a long winter.
Request a Fact Check
December 7, 2011
He has visited Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Iraq.  He even offered to meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Yet in three years, he has not found it in his interest to visit Israel, our ally, our friend, the sole Middle East nation that fully shares our values, the nation in President Truman's words, that is an “embodiment of the great ideals of our civilization.”
Request a Fact Check
December 7, 2011
No, over the past three years, President Obama has instead chastened Israel.  In his inaugural address to the United Nations, the President chastised Israel, but said little about the thousands of Hamas rockets raining into its skies. He’s publicly proposed that Israel adopt indefensible borders. He’s insulted its Prime Minister. And he’s been timid and weak in the face of the existential threat of a nuclear Iran.
Request a Fact Check
December 7, 2011
These actions have emboldened Palestinian hard-liners who now are poised to form a unity government with terrorist Hamas and feel they can bypass Israel at the bargaining table. President Obama has immeasurably set back the prospect of peace in the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
December 7, 2011
I would not meet with Ahmadinejad. He should be excluded from diplomatic society. He should be indicted for the crime of incitement to genocide under Article III of the Genocide Convention. Iran’s ayatollahs will not be permitted to obtain nuclear weapons on my watch. A nuclear-armed Iran is not only a threat to Israel, it is a threat to the entire world.  Our friends must never fear that we will not stand by them in an hour of need. Our enemies should never doubt our resolve.
Request a Fact Check
December 7, 2011
This election is not only a referendum on President Obama’s failures on employment, on income growth, on housing, on recovery, or on a nuclear-intent Iran, on an emboldened China and on friends like Israel being put at greater risk. This election will decide what kind of America we will be. It is defining.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
This year, we are gathering at a dangerous time for Israel and for America. Not since the dark days of 1967 and 1973 has the Middle East faced peril as it does today. This is a critical moment. America must not – and, if I am President, it will not – fail this defining test of history.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
In recent days and weeks, we’ve heard a lot of words from the administration. Its clear message has been to warn Israel to consider the costs of military action against Iran. I do not believe that we should be issuing public warnings that create distance between the United States and Israel. Israel does not need public lectures about how to weigh decisions of war and peace. It needs our support.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
I have studied the writings and speeches of the jihadists. They argue for a one-state solution—one all-dominating radical Islamist state, that is. Their objective is not freedom, not prosperity, not a Palestinian state, but the destruction of Israel. And negotiating and placating such jihadists will never, ever yield peace in the Middle East.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
I recognize in the ayatollahs of Iran the zealot refrain of dominion. Their passion for the martyrdom of Arab youth is matched only by their cowardice in avoiding it for themselves. Nuclear ambition is pursued by Iran to dominate, to subjugate, and to obliterate. A nuclear Iran is not only a problem for Israel; it is also a problem for America and the world.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
In the Gulf, Iran prepares to close the Strait of Hormuz, to hold hostage 20 percent of the world’s oil. In their nuclear laboratories, they prepare the means to hold hostage the entire planet.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
Iran has long engaged in terrorism around the world, most recently in Georgia and in Thailand. In Washington, DC, Iran plotted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador by bombing a Georgetown restaurant. Iran has deployed Hezbollah and Hamas and armed the insurgents of Iraq and Afghanistan, killing our sons and daughters. They war against America.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
Yet, the current administration has promoted a policy of engagement with Iran. The President offered to sit down with Ahmadinejad during his first year in office without preconditions. He sat silent as Iranian dissidents took to the streets of Tehran, not wanting to disrupt the potential opportunity for dialogue with Iran’s fanatical tyrants. This President not only dawdled in imposing crippling sanctions, he has opposed them.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
Of course, the administration’s naïve outreach to Iran gave the ayatollahs exactly what they wanted most. It gave them time. Whatever sanctions they may now belatedly impose, Iran has already gained three invaluable years.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
There are some in this administration who argue that Iran’s leaders are “rational,” and that we can do business with them. The President speaks of common interests. Let me be clear: we do not have common interests with a terrorist regime. Their interest is in the destruction of Israel and the domination of the Middle East. It is profoundly irrational to suggest that the ayatollahs think the way we do or share our values. They do not.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
I will bring the current policy of procrastination toward Iran to an end. I will not delay in imposing further crippling sanctions, and I will not hesitate to fully implement the ones we currently have. I will make sure Iran knows of the very real peril that awaits if it becomes nuclear. I will engage Iran’s neighbors. I will station multiple carriers and warships at Iran’s door. I will stand with the Syrian people who are being mercilessly slaughtered. I know that the fall of Assad would not only be an important victory for liberty, but also a strategic blow to Tehran.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
I believe the right course is what Ronald Reagan called “peace through strength.” There is a reason why the Iranians released the hostages on the same day and at the same hour that Reagan was sworn into office. As President, I will offer that kind of clarity, strength, and resolve.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
In a Romney administration, the world will know that the bond between Israel and America is unbreakable – and that our opposition to a nuclear Iran is absolute. We must not allow Iran to have the bomb or the capacity to make a bomb. Our enemies should never doubt our resolve and our allies should never doubt our commitment.
Request a Fact Check
March 6, 2012
This is a president who has failed to put in place crippling sanctions against Iran. He's also failed to communicate that military options are on the table.
July 11, 2012
“I was stunned by his comments, and shocked by them. This is Hugo Chavez, this is Venezuela. This is Chavez who has invited Iran in, who has invited Hezbollah. Hezbollah, of course, being a surrogate and a proxy for Iran would potentially have access to weapons that could be used against us. … The idea that this nation, this president doesn’t pose a national security threat to this country is simply naïve. It’s an extraordinary admission on the part of this president to be completely out of touch with what’s happened in Latin America.” – Mitt Romney
Request a Fact Check
July 11, 2012
“I was stunned by his comments, and shocked by them. This is Hugo Chavez, this is Venezuela. This is Chavez who has invited Iran in, who has invited Hezbollah. Hezbollah, of course, being a surrogate and a proxy for Iran would potentially have access to weapons that could be used against us. This is Chavez who champions the Bolivarian Revolution movement and is spreading dictatorships and tyranny throughout Latin America. This is Chavez who supports FARC and other terrorist activity in nations like Colombia, that are our friends. The idea that this nation, this president doesn’t pose a national security threat to this country is simply naïve. It’s an extraordinary admission on the part of this president to be completely out of touch with what’s happened in Latin America.  Latin America is critical to America, United States of America.  And the President needs to focus on what’s happening there, what Chavez is doing, what the Castros are doing. These are people who call for terrible acts against America and to suggest that somehow this is isn’t important is, I think, a very misguided and misdirected thought on the part of our President.”
Request a Fact Check
July 24, 2012
Lives of American servicemen and women are at stake.  But astonishingly, the administration failed to change its ways. More top-secret operations were leaked, even some involving covert action in Iran.
Request a Fact Check
July 24, 2012
But at least he was consistent.  After all, this is the president who faltered when the Iranian people were looking for support in their struggle against the ayatollahs.  That uprising was treated as an inconvenient problem for the President’s policy of engagement, instead of as a moral and strategic opportunity.  That terrible misjudgment should never be repeated.  When unarmed women and men in Tehran find the courage to confront their oppressors, at risk of torture and death, they should hear the unequivocal voice of an American president affirming their right to be free.
Request a Fact Check
July 24, 2012
President Obama is fond of lecturing Israel’s leaders. He was even caught by a microphone deriding them. He has undermined their position, which was tough enough as it was.  And even at the United Nations, to the enthusiastic applause of Israel’s enemies, he spoke as if our closest ally in the Middle East was the problem.
Request a Fact Check
July 24, 2012
We’ll need that same clarity of purpose and resolve in the Middle East.  America cannot be neutral in the outcome there.  We must clearly stand for the values of representative government, economic opportunity, and human rights. And we must stand against the extension of Iranian or jihadist influence.
Request a Fact Check
July 24, 2012
The same ayatollahs who each year mark a holiday by leading chants of “Death to America” are not going to be talked out of their pursuit of nuclear weapons.  What’s needed is all the firmness, clarity, and moral courage that we and our allies can gather.  Sanctions must be enforced without exception, cutting off the regime’s sources of wealth.  Negotiations must secure full and unhindered access for inspections.  As it is, the Iranian regime claims the right to enrich nuclear material for supposedly peaceful purposes.  This claim is discredited by years of deception.  A clear line must be drawn: There must be a full suspension of any enrichment, period.
Request a Fact Check
July 24, 2012
And at every turn, Iran must know that the United States and our allies stand as one in these critical objectives.  Only in this way can we successfully counter the catastrophic threat that Iran presents.  I pledge to you and to all Americans that if I become commander-in-chief, I will use every means necessary to protect ourselves and the region, and to prevent the worst from happening while there is still time.
Request a Fact Check
Show more statements

Where Your Friends Stand

Where You Stand

The
Issues
Your
Endorsement
Who Americans
Trust More*
Abortion Pick a Candidate
Trust dealing with social issues such as abortion and gay marriage. 09/09/2012 39% Romney 50% Obama
Afghanistan Pick a Candidate
Trust handling international affairs 09/09/2012 38% Romney 51% Obama
Economy Pick a Candidate
Trust handling the economy. 10/13/2012 44% Romney 48% Obama
Education Pick a Candidate
Trust to do better job handling education. 08/25/2012 42% Romney 45% Obama
Energy Pick a Candidate
Trust handling energy policy 08/25/2012 41% Romney 49% Obama
Environment Pick a Candidate
No Data
Foreign Policy Pick a Candidate
Trust handling international affairs 10/13/2012 40% Romney 50% Obama
Government Spending Pick a Candidate
Trust dealing with the federal budget deficit 10/13/2012 47% Romney 44% Obama
Gun Control Pick a Candidate
No Data
Health Care Pick a Candidate
Trust handling health care policy 10/13/2012 43% Romney 49% Obama
Immigration Pick a Candidate
Trust handling immigration issues 07/08/2012 43% Romney 46% Obama
Iran Pick a Candidate
Trust handling international affairs 09/09/2012 38% Romney 51% Obama
Jobs Pick a Candidate
Trust to do a better job creating jobs (AP-GfK) 08/20/2012 44% Romney 45% Obama
Medicare Pick a Candidate
Trust handling Medicare 10/13/2012 38% Romney 53% Obama
Military Spending Pick a Candidate
Better at being a good commander-in-chief (NBC/WSJ) 07/22/2012 35% Romney 45% Obama
Same-sex marriage Pick a Candidate
Trust to handle social issues such as abortion and gay marriage 09/09/2012 39% Romney 50% Obama
Social Security Pick a Candidate
Stronger on Social Security (Reuters/Ipsos) 09/10/2012 39% Romney 46% Obama
Taxes Pick a Candidate
Trust handling taxes 10/13/2012 44% Romney 49% Obama
*Poll results from Post-ABC polls among registered voters unless otherwise noted. Complete results available in the Post poll archive.

About Issue Engine

The Issue Engine is a place to learn where the presidential candidates stand on the important issues of the election and choose which candidate better represents your views.

Read more »